To: brivette
Why is this misleading and what are they saying the significance is? So what if these guys did or did not serve in the military? Sorry I'm dense.
6 posted on
11/17/2005 5:46:09 AM PST by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: Khepera
The list implies that Repubs/conservatives that didn't serve are duplictious.
10 posted on
11/17/2005 5:49:27 AM PST by
brivette
To: Khepera
Why is this misleading ONE thing (of many, I'm sure) that is misleading, is listing John F'ing Kerry's BS medals that he wrote himself up for.
11 posted on
11/17/2005 5:49:35 AM PST by
DocH
(Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
To: Khepera
It's misleading because it shows who DID serve on the Democratic side, and who DID NOT serve on the Republican side. I think if they wanted to show the full list from both, it would be more fair.
Still, the point is basically moot. Many of those museam pieces are draft era malcontents who stumbled their way into office. They clearly hold no special attachment to the present day military, a fact that is not lost on us.
30 posted on
11/17/2005 6:06:38 AM PST by
Steel Wolf
(* No sleep till Baghdad! *)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson