Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: brivette

Why is this misleading and what are they saying the significance is? So what if these guys did or did not serve in the military? Sorry I'm dense.


6 posted on 11/17/2005 5:46:09 AM PST by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Khepera

The list implies that Repubs/conservatives that didn't serve are duplictious.


10 posted on 11/17/2005 5:49:27 AM PST by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Khepera
Why is this misleading

ONE thing (of many, I'm sure) that is misleading, is listing John F'ing Kerry's BS medals that he wrote himself up for.

11 posted on 11/17/2005 5:49:35 AM PST by DocH (Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Khepera
It's misleading because it shows who DID serve on the Democratic side, and who DID NOT serve on the Republican side. I think if they wanted to show the full list from both, it would be more fair.

Still, the point is basically moot. Many of those museam pieces are draft era malcontents who stumbled their way into office. They clearly hold no special attachment to the present day military, a fact that is not lost on us.

30 posted on 11/17/2005 6:06:38 AM PST by Steel Wolf (* No sleep till Baghdad! *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson