VANITY: "LIBERAL" Search Engines: Hit them where it hurts!

Netscape Home Page | 11/15/05 | Darth AirBorne

[AirBorn]

Hello Posters,

Here are some examples of recent News "Headlines" on a Seach Engine and Home Page & various " SEARCH RESULTS " found on the internet within the last few weeks ;

- " Polls: Majority say Bush is Dirty Liar "

- " Pentagon Admits : used Flame Throwers and Nuclear Bombs on Civilians and helpless Iraqi Insurgent Revolutionary Freedom Fighters ."

Search Results found for word searched " REPUBLICAN " :

- " Republican " -- Republican Crooks . Comm - How The party is stealing from old ladies and children.

Search Results for " Democrat " :

- " Democrat " -- Democrat Winners . Com -How the Democrat Party is only hope for world as we know it.

These are but a few of the "Headlines" and "Search Results" that I am sure you and your family has been exposed to while on the net or home page at their public school-place of work - university.

[AirBorn]

Hello Posters,

While I don't have to " Name Names " as they say, ( to advoid legal problems here )I am all sure you know some of the Top Web Home pages that the majority of Americans turn on at HOME, WORK, and most importantly : At your PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS and COLLEGES through-out America!

Now the ABOVE examples are exagerations --but the do NOT down play the IMPORTANCE of the POLITICAL STANCE that these Engines take and the SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES of their PROPAGANDA DRIVE and AGENDA in the long term --especially when these Liberals Slants are presented in the PUBLIC SCHOOLS Forum!

Everyone remembers those stories during the 2004 elections of the XXX Homepage Question & Answer Site FOR UNSUPERVISED CHILDREN CURIOUS ABOUT POLITICS--where one question about ELECTIONS on their " BOT " answer to the query " I am voting for Bush " was " Why do you want to Vote for Bush? Why don't you Vote for John Kerry " and other such SLANTED PROGRAMING that they have said has been since " REPAIRED " .

I have a certain HOME PAGE set and after the last few months of HEADLINES of the NEWS that are used there that this Home Page has decided to use AS THEIR NEWS HOME PAGE SOURCE FOR ALL AMERICA TO SEE!!! ( C llinton N ational N ews )--I have decided to take action!!!

I AM SICK AND TIRED AND AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!

Especially since just now my young nephew walked into the house to announce that at school on THIER PUBLIC SCHOOL HOOM ROOM COMPUTER (their Liberal teacher had picked AND SET THAT PAGE!) That he and his class had learned Bush had admited Our Army used Lethal-banned-chemical WMDs against CIVILIANS in Iraq!

The "Story" was about chemicals used by our military--the CHARGES were made by a COMMUNIST GROUP in ITALY--and as YOU go there to read it--you can see how slanted the HEADLINE is from the Article to WHAT IS ACTUALLY IN THE ARTICLE--typical spin.

I went to the FAX PAGE--and found the XXXXXXXXX.com Headquarters address and phone listings..

and FROM THERE I had received a list of their ADVERTISERS ON THERE SITES and various LINKS TOO!!!

I am writing Letters to the Parent HOME PAGE voicing my Complaints about their difinite LIBERAL SLANT--and their difinite ANTI-BUSH Slant --

and that I plan to Write to EVERY ADVERTISER informing them I am on a " compaign " myself to make sure NONE of my Friends, Neighbors, or relatives use THEIR PRODUCTS! and that I will be going DOOR TO DOOR - flyers and posters and all - to ask OTHERS to SPEAK OUT against such Blatant Propaganda and Backing of Liberal Agenda based NEWS and General Reporting!

It STARTS NOW--with a Little HERE and a Little Sneaks in THERE...little News Stories and HEADLINES that the Public reads real quick that has NOTHING to do sometimes with even the actual article!!

I don't want to mention the web site / home page here for legal reasons ( but it sounds like what happens to you when you walk around outside when it rains..you get " XXX " + and add this word to when a Criminal eXXXXXX from a jail and you have the site I am talk about : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .com.

Are YOU sick of not only the LIBERAL MEDIA and Electronic Communications Pleading the democrat case for everyone to see!!! Are YOU sick of this Propaganda and non-competitive placement in PUBLIC SCHOOLS and TAX PAYER BASED services & agencies !!??

The American Public--young and old--all sometimes just have enough time to read the HEADLINES--and they are saying that the majority of people ARE GETTING that FROM THEIR home page as they go to get their MAIL before they go to work.

They don't have TIME to fully read the whole article to get to the CORE--and it is this Slanted, Biased Headlines that will be REPEATED and PASSED AROUND and indoctrinated to our children!!

Start ending it NOW!!

Start with letting these Home Page Companies KNOW!!

Start by letting their ADVERTISERS know!!

WE do the same with the Newspapers/ mags/ and Cable/TV stations and shows TOO--it's time to start here before the 2008 elections! And--like the terrorists in Iraq who had snuck back in slowly one by one into once free towns until it was too late because they had Grown so BIG WITHOUT anyone noticing!!--don't let the liberals get the chance to take over these sites before it is too late.

The Pen may have more power than the sword--but I say it is in the POCKETBOOK that you really hurt someone!!

Darth AirBorne

[xcamel]

OSTT ping!

[Gopher Broke]

Tell us which advertisers to email and we will help....need their emails posted here.

Thanks for your hard work on something important!!

PS...I dont use Google or Yahoo search any more because of their hard left agenda...for now, use alltheweb.com I hope they are OK.

[SquirrelKing]

"Thank you" for your "post" about the "search engines"...

/funnin' ya =)

[MineralMan]

Well. I just typed in 'Republican' in Google. Nothing of the kind that you mentioned showed up there.

You can "name names" anytime you want. But, if you don't, your message has no effect at all.

By the way, this is not News in any way. Please don't post vanities as news.

[harpu]

hmmmmm...

[cripplecreek]

Two words.



DEE CAFF

[precedence]

Please take some time to understand who's at fault here. First of all, the major search portals simply display what is either popular or a common consensus among newspapers; if there seems to be a bias, it's simply being reflected. You can be sure that the major portals -- and I'm referring to THE most popular search engine - are careful to have unbiased algorithms; afterall, about half their audience in the US is conservative.

Also, any results turned up by searching are also a result of algorithms; yes, some users take advantage of those algorithms for their own purposes - think Google bombing - but the searching techniques are sounds.

You also told us about ONE result from each search, to further your agenda. Of course you'll find negative stuff if you are looking for it. You are well-intentioned; please put your efforts where they will make a difference. Thanks.

[mwyounce]

Well. I just typed in 'Republican' in Google. Nothing of the kind that you mentioned showed up there.

That's BECAUSE he MADE them UP:

Now the ABOVE examples are exagerations

[MineralMan]

"You also told us about ONE result from each search, to further your agenda. Of course you'll find negative stuff if you are looking for it. You are well-intentioned; please put your efforts where they will make a difference. Thanks."

---

Huh? I have no agenda. This poster did not name the search engine he was talking about, so I checked Google, and found nothing like what he mentioned.

This was a vanity post. It was also devoid of any useful information, and was incorrect for the search engine I use. Indeed, all search engines turn up both positive and negative results. Both extremes are on the web, so it's natural that they show up when you do searches.

My only point was that the original post was worthless as it stood. It presented no real information and was merely a rant with no point.

[BikerNYC]

Frist you say:

Here are some examples of recent News "Headlines" on a Seach Engine and Home Page & various " SEARCH RESULTS " found on the internet within the last few weeks

And then you say:

Now the ABOVE examples are exagerations

That is a lousy way to start things off.

[xcamel]

Sorry, it has been proved several times that this is indeed not true. They are as biased as the MSM, if not worse.

[MineralMan]

"That's BECAUSE he MADE them UP: "

Yes, he did. He lied about the results in his rant. So...what good is his rant? There's plenty of bias out there that can actually be addressed. Phony stuff isn't needed.

This entire thread is based on lies.

[precedence]

Sorry MineralMan, my comments were meant for the original poster; my bad. --tje

[MineralMan]

No problem. I always find that if I go to the original post, then Reply to the comment left after it, I don't get myself in trouble. I've made the same mistake in the past.

[angcat]

I just put alltheweb on my work computer. I will do the same at home. I'm sure my 10 year old will protest but I shall explain.

[mwyounce]

Exactly.

[DaGman]

So many leaks and not enough fingers and toes.

[MineralMan]

"I just put alltheweb on my work computer. I will do the same at home."

OK. Now, do the "miserable failure" search on alltheweb. It still pops up the Bush page, but as the second hit instead of the first.

Search engines search for stuff. They list the results they find on the web. They all end up listing pretty much the same stuff.