Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wildbill

Trajan was right at the end of his life when he did it, and his successor Hadrian withdrew from the Gulf just a year or three after the conquest of the province "Mesopotamia". Trajan had it goin' on, that's how he did it. :') Anthony had a real problem hittin' the sauce, and botched his attempt.

Hadrian had to be talked out of abandoning Dacia (Trajan's finest piece of imperialism, and regarded as the all-time peak of the Roman Empire, economically), but did pull back from Scotland along with Mesopotamia. Hadrian also spent a lot of cash building a cult of Antinoos, one of the boys Hadrian liked to, uh, romance, after Antinoos drowned in the Nile (got chomped by a hippo, or somethin').

I guess that was an unnecessary aside, eh? ;')


10 posted on 11/14/2005 8:57:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Wednesday, November 2, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Interestingly, the Scots were one of the only European cultures that the Romans couldn't conquer. Hadrian finally pulled back, essentially said "Nothing up there is worth another Roman life" and built a wall to keep the Scots at bay.

He was probably right.:-)


13 posted on 11/15/2005 6:57:13 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson