I'm against making peyote or magic mushrooms or marijuana illegal (the absurdity of making something that grows naturally comes to mind).
However, I also question the results of any study that sets out to prove a point and then, surprise, reaches the desired conclusion.
These study's proably involve the use of what ever they are studying to come to the end conclusion...
I'm with you! I'm very surprised at the number of posters on this site who think that monitoring and/or destroying God's own creation is a proper function of the Federal government, in addition to the arrest and punishment of those who make so bold as to defy the government's peremptory prohibitions on consumption of these vegetable products.
I always find this attitude demonstrates an alarming trust of the 'progressive' social-engineering potential of the State, a conditioned mental state I expect among the lefties, but not among self-described conservatives.