In this case, the continuing insistence on wildly distorting what was originally said, then arguing against points that weren't actually made suggests that the fight certain posters want to pick is with other people entirely. Who else could those other people be but men who have caused the posters such problems in the past?
I only reply to posts that directly address something I actually said. Yours is the first one of those in a long while. ;)
It is difficult crafting a good, meaningful response when I have to dedicate a good portion of the response to explain that what has been raised has no real connection to what I was saying, and was conjecture or imagination on the part of the other poster.