Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gobucks
My specific reference was to theological liberalism in the 19th Century in the mainline Protestant denominations. The Ivy League universities were largely founded by Calvinist churches. Only one became Unitarian (Harvard) in the early 19th Century. The others lost their Christian emphasis in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries as orthodox belief was supplanted by theological liberalism among Congregationalists and Northern Presbyterians and Baptists. Nevertheless, the elite universities and private schools maintained high academic standards even as they became heterodox and secular humanist in orientation.

Theological liberalism first arose in Germany partly in response to findings in various fields, such as archeology and geology, that seemed to disprove the accuracy of Scripture. It also sought to answer the philosophical arguments against orthodox Christian teachings that arose during the Enlightenment of the 18th Century. Its origins are in the German Enlightenment, notably in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and the religious views of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Major tenets of theological liberalism are the beliefs that personal opinion and experience outweigh dogma, that the Christian church is a community of persons united by common experience rather than creeds, and the absence of fixed, immutable truths. Liberal Christians generally reject the historicity and accuracy of many books of the Bible and deny or treat as mythology such core Christian doctrines as the Virgin Birth, the Trinity, and the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

As for what nurtured the rise of theological liberalism in the mainline churches, the prestige and scholarship of the German and European universities where these doctrines were taught and the relative lack of evangelical apologists to counter the claims of ascendant liberalism were major factors. Only one seminary, Princeton, was a stronghold of orthodox Christian scholarship, and even that institution succumbed to liberalism before 1930. The evangelical community was by and large more interested in soul winning. The "superstars" among evangelicals between the Civil War and World War II were popular orators like Dwight Moody and Billy Sunday, not scholars like Benjamin Warfield or J. Gresham Machen.

As Marxist theory thrived in the absence of strong defenders of free market economics in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries, so liberal Christianity gained ascendancy as evangelicals failed to challenge their positions effectively. The popular revivalists may have "won souls" in the rural areas and working class neighborhoods of the cities, but they were largely the subject of disdain, if not ridicule, among the upper classes. The results of this emphasis, combined with the effects of dispensational theology, separationism, and sinless perfection theology, provided a clear path for liberal Christians in their long march to dominate the mainline Protestant denominations and the prestigious private universities.

66 posted on 10/31/2005 8:17:15 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Wallace T.

Lotta good points there. Helps explain why unions didn't take off in the South too. (IMHO)


67 posted on 10/31/2005 8:37:28 PM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson