[69ConvertibleFirebird]

Do you actually have a response, or is it enough to just spout FUD, then ignore detailed, factual rebuttals?

LOL!!! I didn't realize that I was on some kind of freep timer where I had to respond immediately to rants. I apologize for having to work, and not post to FR, while at my job.

Anyway, I'll let you argue with the original article: "There is endless debate among security experts about whether the paucity of successful assaults on Apple's (AAPL) OS X is attributable to ... attackers' lack of interest in an operating system whose share of the market is in single digits." Have fun!

And like I said, nobody, that's NOBODY, has created a worm to attack the Commodore 64. Commodore 64 RULES!!!!

[zeugma]

Did you even bother to read that post I made? You're trying to continue to sow the "small marketshare" FUD line that seems to be relied on by so many windows bigots here as an article of faith.

Just to be clear, are you tring to claim that the available target of MacOS users is smaller than the mere 12,000 hosts sucessfully targeted by the "witty" worm?

Face the facts that windows is such a target because it is so easy to hack.