Posted on 10/22/2005 2:31:46 PM PDT by doug from upland
ATTN ADMIN MODERATOR - no link here to the ad, just the content of the description. I hope that is okay.
=========================================================================
ESTRICH REFUSES TO SPEAK WITH BROADDRICK
=========================================================================
SUSAN ESTRICH REFUSES TO SPEAK WITH RAPE VICTIM JUANITA BROADDRICK
NOTE: You are bidding on a print out from my computer of three emails and an unforgettable picture (see below) of Clinton defender and professor of law Susan Estrich arranged in a frame and signed by Doug from Upland (my screen name on FreeRepublic.com and caller name on talk radio).
Juanita Broaddrick, known as Jane Doe No. 5 during the Clinton Impeachment, appeared on an historic NBC interview with Lisa Myers, broadcast on Feb. 24, 1999. Yes, NBC delayed the broadcast until after the Impeachment vote in the Senate. In the interview, Broaddrick discussed her accusation of rape against the then attorney general of Arkansas, Bill Clinton. Overwhelmingly, those who saw the interview believed her charges.
Democratic political operative Estrich, as you may recall, was responsible for the hilarious photo-op of Michael Dukakis in the tank looking like a silly little boy playing grownup. Political pundits are still debating which is the silliest photo-op ever. Is it Dukakis in the tank or John F. Kerry crawling out of the space capsule looking like a little blue bunny or, as some have suggested, a blue sperm character from a Woody Allen movie?
DESCRIPTION OF THE FRAMED PRESENTATION:
1. Email challenge to Estrich to speak with fellow rape victim and Bill Clinton accuser Juanita Broaddrick.
2. Email of the good news to Estrich that Broaddrick contacted me and was looking forward to a meeting with Estrich.
3. Email from Estrich responding: "not interested"
4. Unforgettable picture of Estrich
Note: from the emails, I reserve the right to redact my personal phone number and cell phone number.
BACKGROUND: There is a chance that this offering could become historic memorabilia. On Oct. 11, 2005, Estrich was plugging her new Hillary book on the Sean Hannity show. Hannity confronted her about Broaddrick's very credible rape accusation. Estrich, herself a rape victim, didn't believe Broaddrick. In her eyes, Broaddrick is apparently a liar. How does Estrich know? Well, she had a conversation with Clinton, and he told her he didn't do it.
Let's see if we have this correct. Clinton lied to his wife, lied to his daughter, lied to reporters, lied to his supporters, lied to the grand jury, lied to his secretary, lied to his cabinet, lied to his dog Buddy, and lied to all of us while pointing his finger at us and telling us he was going to get back to work for the American people. Gee, Bill, what kind of work would that be? Defending this nation? Despite all of the lies, by some cosmic miracle that is beyond the comprehension of man, he would never, never, never lie to Susan Estrich. Is that reasonably accurrate?
I attempted to set up a conversation between Estrich and Broaddrick because of the comments made by Estrich on the Hannity show. Certainly, the fair minded law professor Estrich would want to hear Broaddrick's side of the story, wouldn't she? After each of two phone conversations with Estrich's secretary, I followed up with an email. Broaddrick was willing. Unfortunately, Estrich would have nothing to do with it.
You can make your own determination regarding why Estrich refuses to speak with Broaddrick. Could it be that Estrich will be forced to confront the truth? If she confronts the truth, what would she do about her support of Bill and Hillary? We all know that, behind the scenes, it was Hillary working feverishly to destroy the women who dared come forward to tell their stories. That threatened her political power. You might have never seen it on Brokaw, Jennings, and Rather, but many of those who came forward to tell their stories were audited by the IRS.
Estrich is a lawyer and a law professor who trains prospective lawyers. She knows the importance of hearing all sides and seeing all the evidence. But in this case, political power and agenda seem more important than the truth. It is ironic. A rape victim refuses to speak with a fellow rape victim. Instead, she takes the side of the accused rapist in public forums. Report of Sean Hannity show appearance - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1500726/posts Report of original challenge to Estrich - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1504364/posts Report that Broaddrick is willing to meet - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1505356/posts Report of Estrich refusal - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1506863/posts PS - Early in 2006, look for the documentary film, INDICTING HILLARY. www.HillCAP.org How much do you know about the largest campaign finance fraud on record?
I hope all of you who can find it will start sending it around the world. If someone in the press can pick it up, maybe that turn the heat on Estrich. That is the point. How dare her try to sell her Hillary book, knock Juanita, and defend Clinton while refusing to even speak with the rape victim and hear her side.
I am having so much fun with this.
Let's keep the thread bumped and the questions coming at e-bay over the next 9 days...lol.
I should have included in the ad that our favorite website would be the beneficiary of a donation. My mistake.
Wait until you see what I do in the future with a Kendall photo. Then, a Peter Paul and Hillary. This really is way too much fun. I don't care about bids. Just keep asking questions.
Boy - that says it all!
BTW, I just did an ebay search for "estrich" and didn't find your ad although I did see it there a while ago. Does it disappear when you're on there answering questions? Sure hope eBay didn't pull it.
Doug, I love your moxie. Keep it up. I love sending your posts to my friends, and some "dumb Democrats" (who I thought would love reading them, or maybe I should say I enjoyed sending them)
I changed the name to nail Bill and Hillary, put Estrich in the subtitle, and did not get back to the title to add back Estrich again. Whoops.
You have FReepmail. :)
Sending this to Democrats is excellent. I expect I might get some unfriendly questions, but that's fine. I'll just answer them the way I want and still stick it to them.
"Doug this is a bit tacky. You shouldn't be using FR as a advertisement for yourself."
Showing pregnant women pictures of mutilated dead babies is a bit tacky too. But it prevents murder. If it didn't why would the PP Storm Troopers want to have special exclusion from bankruptcy to persecute anti-abortion protesters?
Calling rapist-enablers like Estrich on her continued enabling, her denial, her co-conspiring in perpetuating the Toon Tyranny is also tacky, like you said. But it might help prevent your daughter or neighbor from being raped themselves. It might help keep the most UNethical administration in history from returning, forever, to the White House.
Doug isn't in this for the money. This is passionate activism. BRAVO, Doug, and a BUMP!
-- the Blur
doug answer #2 is wrong I think, it should say Juanita Broadrick where it says Hillary Rodham Clinton..
Q: You're selling printouts of personal emails from people that are barely famous who participated in things that happened several years ago and are now irrelevant? The term LOSER doesn't even begin to describe you. Oct-22-05
A: How much of a loser does it take to read the contents of an auction he doesn't like and then to take the time to ask a question? In case you were asleep, genius, an event just happened. Susan Estrich knocked Juanita Broaddrick on talk radio, essentially calling her a liar. Estrich believes the rapist, a known and serial liar and sexual predator, and has refused to even hear from the rape victim. That is what made it news. Get off your kneepads, wipe the Clinton DNA from your chin, and go do something useful like raking the leaves.
Doh. It is the third question. Please ask a question about it so I can clarify. Thanks.
I think she's had work done recently.
Her cheeks looked much smaller when I saw her on Hannity the other night.
She herself had been the victim of a sexual assault
But when there's another victim, it cannot be Clinton's fault
He told her he hadn't done it and he'd never tell a lie
After all, we know Bill Clinton is a really honest guy
Susan Estrich, for Bill she's on her knees
She will not speak with Juanita, so just STFU, please
When she flaps her gums she scares us every time she's on TV
If your kids are under 15, you should never let them see
She pretends to be so caring with a really open mind
But from what I've seen, Ms. Estrich, you can just kiss my behind
Susan Estrich, for Bill she's on her knees
She will not speak with Juanita, so just STFU, please
She's the guy who told Dukakis he should get into the tank
It would really be a winner, he could take it to the bank
Was she telling John F. Kerry a space capsule would be fun
There's debating on which photo-op is really number one
Susan Estrich, for Bill she's on her knees
She will not speak with Juanita, so just STFU, please
We have heard her on the talk shows when her book she wants to sell
She's promoting evil Hillary who'd be as bad as hell
She's the product of a union, that's what many experts said
When the devil from Tazmania and Carol Channing wed
Susan Estrich, for Bill she's on her knees
She will not speak with Juanita, so just STFU, please
Susan Estrich, for Bill she's on her knees
She will not speak with Juanita, so just STFU, please
+
=
Hasn't Susan had plastic surgery since that unfortunate appearance on Fox?
That picture reminds me of a certain episode of Star Trek.
William Jefferson Clinton, biological father unknown, was elected president of the United States TWICE and ruled over America from 1993 to 2000 in a reign of error, silliness, and shame distinctive for crudity and the bizarre in modern times. The 1990s will be remembered as the Era of Clintonism when even Beavis and Butthead ridiculed the moronic absurdity of America's hillbilly rapist president.
Secular humanist liberals who fell victim to the moronic spell of Clintonism exhibit bizarre zombified mental states of dissociation and confusion when confronted with overwhelming evidence of Clinton's unsavory crimes. We, therefore, suggest that a special place in the archives and wikipedias of parapsychology and the paranormal be reserved for entries on "Clintonism" so that future researchers may conduct investigations into this strange and unusual phenomenon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.