Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUSAN ESTRICH MOCKED ON EBAY FOR REFUSING TO SPEAK WITH BILL CLINTON RAPE VICTIM JUANITA BROADDRICK
DFU/EBAY | 10-22-05 | Doug from Upland

Posted on 10/22/2005 2:31:46 PM PDT by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last
To: doug from upland

IMHO: There is a really bad place waiting for Mr. Clinton, but he probably will escape punishment in this one.


101 posted on 10/23/2005 8:03:17 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

I don't expect Bill or Hillary to ever be wearing an orange jumpsuit. I do hope, however, that enough damage is done to keep Hillary out of the White House. If we can't keep her out, I am going to need to change my identity.


102 posted on 10/23/2005 8:08:58 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I am going to need to change my identity.

LOL, Doug from Adak.

103 posted on 10/23/2005 8:13:52 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

or Doug the Eskimo. She'd still find me.


104 posted on 10/23/2005 8:20:03 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Makes me wonder if she actually ever was raped. Maybe she just had a bout of remorse the next morning, and later realized she could parlay it into a political asset among her feminoid friends.

Just file a BS police report and bingo--instant cred among the professional victimologists of the Left.

105 posted on 10/23/2005 9:07:58 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Torie

What do you do at a country club if you don't play golf?


106 posted on 10/23/2005 9:10:39 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I don't challenge her claim.


107 posted on 10/23/2005 9:14:22 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Susan Estrich being rape does establish one fact . Rape is all about power, looks have nothing to do with it.She couldnt get laid in an all male army camp.

Oh I dunno 'bout that. Didn't Chaucer have something to say about "gap-toothed" women?

108 posted on 10/23/2005 9:14:53 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I don't challenge her claim.

I don't mean that you necessarily should. But after so many years of make-it-up-as-you-go-along personal BS anecdotes from the clintonoids, I have a very high index of skepticism for any politically convenient personal claim made by a leftwinger until it is objectively substantiated. That's just me. Other opinions may differ.

109 posted on 10/23/2005 9:21:19 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Doug, can not locate in E-Bay. What is the number?


110 posted on 10/23/2005 9:21:42 AM PDT by Two-Bits (Attn Terrorists: The Democrat Party does not speak for America. America is what is kicking your ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
It has been in public domain all over the Internet.

It has certainly been all over the internet, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's "in public domain".

I know where to find copies of the latest Harry Potter book all over the internet too, but...

Copyright does not go void just because something is widely pirated.

111 posted on 10/23/2005 9:27:31 AM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

I understand. The use of a small amount of video of a news item is fair use. This capture from television is certainly fair use.


112 posted on 10/23/2005 9:29:42 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Two-Bits

You have FReepmail.


113 posted on 10/23/2005 9:30:49 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

bttt


114 posted on 10/23/2005 9:31:42 AM PDT by bmwcyle (We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Two-Bits

eBay Search: Hillary will not like this


115 posted on 10/23/2005 9:32:00 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
IMHO: There is a really bad place waiting for Mr. Clinton, but he probably will escape punishment in this one.

"Probably" doesn't even come close.

Because of the culture climate, & because of who basically controls the MSM....the Clinton's will for the foreseeable future never be exposed for what they have done...and for what they continue to do.

116 posted on 10/23/2005 9:36:44 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
Don't worry. Hillary is going to be exposed for her failure to declare $1.6 million in her 2000 senate race.

www.HillCAP.org.

117 posted on 10/23/2005 9:42:05 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Don't worry. Hillary is going to be exposed for her failure to declare $1.6 million in her 2000 senate race. www.HillCAP.org.

Oh...if I could be that optimistic about that subject!!

I hope it happens Doug...I truly do. But color me very, very doubtful....

Best FRegards,

118 posted on 10/23/2005 9:48:46 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Hillary's heart is blacker than the devil's riding boots......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.

Sir Winston Churchill, Speech, 1941, Harrow School
British politician (1874 - 1965)


119 posted on 10/23/2005 10:17:38 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: All

FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 1999

Clinton's Silence on Rape Claim Suggests Guilt
By DEROY MURDOCK
Why isn't President Clinton behaving like an innocent man?

Juanita Broaddrick of Arkansas accused him of raping her in 1978. In a February 24 interview on NBC's Dateline, Broaddrick said she permitted then-Arkansas Attorney General Clinton to have a professional discussion with her in her Little Rock hotel room during a business convention. They had met while she volunteered on his first gubernatorial campaign. After some light banter, she said, Clinton pounced on her, bit her upper lip until it bled and violently penetrated her after tearing through her panty hose. Before he left, Broaddrick said, Clinton donned his sunglasses and remarked about her bloody lip: "You better put some ice on that."

Broaddrick contemporaneously told four others about this alleged incident including her friend Norma Rogers, a nurse who recalls putting ice on Broaddrick's lip after finding her in shock.

NBC News wrote the White House in early February asking if Broaddrick, a prosperous nursing-home owner, was believable. NBC inquired about Clinton's whereabouts on April 25, 1978 - the day of the alleged rape - and whether he ever knew Broaddrick, saw her in a hotel room or had any sexual contact with her.

We got back the two sentence denial from David Kendall, and that's it, NBC correspondent Lisa Myers explained on Meet the Press February 28. Kendall, President Clinton's private attorney, had issued a cryptic statement nine days earlier. "Any allegation that the president assaulted Mrs. Broaddrick more than 20 years ago is absolutely false," Kendall's communique read. "Beyond that we are not going to comment."

But rather than an airtight refutation of Broaddrick's explosive charges, this statement resembles a bank vault with sliding glass doors. In 1978, Jimmy Carter was president, not Bill Clinton. At that time, Juanita Broaddrick was named Juanita Hickey. Kendall's concoction also may depend on what the meaning of the word "assault" is. Perhaps

Team Clinton has left itself an out should they need to claim that Broaddrick simply misconstrued an act of consensual, albeit very rough, sex."

Someone falsely accused of rape typically would demand to prove his innocence. Instead, President Clinton remains virtually mum and uses his legal wordsmiths as human shields.

Fielding a two-part question on this matter, President Clinton said on February 24: "My counsel has made a statement about the first issue, and I have nothing to add to it."

Three factors explain Bill Clinton's latest stonewall strategy. First, Broaddrick's story is not bulletproof. She waited 21 years to speak up, as Clintonites note. Broaddrick, however, said she doubted anyone would have believed her in 1978, back when rape victims often were considered luckless harlots. Wishing to forget the painful experience, Broaddrick said, she filed an affidavit in the Paula Jones case denying the alleged incident. She later recanted this affirmation after receiving immunity from Special Prosecutor Kenneth Starr. Broaddrick finally decided to come forward. "I didn't want [my] granddaughters and nieces to turn to me and say, 'Why didn't you tell what this man did to you?'"

Second, Clinton expects his allies to roll their eyes even at serious rape accusations and demand that he be left alone. They haven't let him down "It is too late in the day, 21 years later, to be deliberating a rape charge here," Susan Estrich - a Democratic activist, law professor and rape victim - said on Meet the Press. "The country wants to move on."

"There is a legal system out there. It can handle future charges," said House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt (D - Missouri). "But we need in the Congress to get back to the people's business."

And, as if possessed by Salvador Dali, Vice-President Al Gore on February 26 unveiled $223 million in federal grants to "stop violence against women, once and for all."

Finally, President Clinton understands that Arkansas' six-year statute of limitations on rape has expired. The star-crossed Senate impeachment trial is over. No forum exists to adjudicate these charges.

Legally, this is true. However, unless the U.S. has become a monarchy, President Clinton owes the American people more than a wave of his scepter. Citizens, journalists, feminists, honest Democrats and sentient Republicans should insist that Bill Clinton explain himself. As Patricia Ireland, President of the National Organization for Women, declared: "I think that his legal team ought to bring forward some of the documentation on Clinton's whereabouts in April 1978. I don't think we can just say, 'Oh, well. It's too late.'"

Clinton also could clear the air by holding a live, prime-time news conference to answer reporters' questions until they leave satisfied. Should he ignore these grave charges rather than rebut them, Bill Clinton will have no one but himself to blame if people believe Juanita Broaddrick's straightforward claim: the President of the United States is a rapist.


120 posted on 10/23/2005 10:29:46 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson