Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeRep
"By "elites" I mean so called conservatives who will not owe him a chance to make the case that his nominee is who he says she is, and to listen to her Senate testimony before making a final decision about whether to oppose her."

If they can't take the label of elite/snobs after implying that the woman is a floor scrubber, then let's give them a new one....

PUNDITBOTS comes to mind.

(Hey..fair is fair)

Prediction...

All of Frum's horses and all of Krystal's men just couldn't put Coulter back together again.

.....and now back to the sponsors of the anti-Miers champaign who are really ticked that they didn't make their brand of Kool-aide a little bit stronger.

35 posted on 10/16/2005 12:46:32 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Proud right-winger who loves this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Earthdweller

In you post lies the reason why you have lost the debate. You are unable to actually offer an argument. All you can do is think up names to call those who have won the debate, and who will cause president Bush to nominate a qualified person the Supreme Court. Well, I have a name for you: Sore losers. When this thing is over, you can apologize and thank more consistent conservatives for the better, actually qualified post-Miers nominee.


37 posted on 10/16/2005 12:53:39 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson