Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: msnimje

I agree they are not qualifications. I just submit that for a long long time, a lot of folks are perfectly fine to use this combination of criteria (plus conservative) as grounds for elimination from consideration for sitting on SCOTUS.

That is why no one has yet answered my original question, have you noticed? The earliest 'maybe' is Black ... but he went off the 'reservation pronto. Who was the last conservative southern protestant to serve as a conservative southern protestant on the court??

I bet you don't know.


27 posted on 10/15/2005 1:19:37 PM PDT by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: gobucks
Who was the last conservative southern protestant to serve as a conservative southern protestant on the court??

It doesn't matter becuase it could not be more irrelevant. The Supreme Court is not a place where you put certain percentages of certain groups. Likewise, it would not matter if there were 9 Southern Protestant Whites on the Supreme Court as long as they all had real qualifications and mental acuity to handle being there.

Your argument is a Red Herring trying to get people to ignore the fact that Harriet Miers is not qualified to sit on the Supreme Court.
28 posted on 10/15/2005 4:48:02 PM PDT by msnimje (14-Day Free Trial into Monthly Subscription to Times Select, $7.95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson