[MeanWestTexan]

Wow, you are hateful and assuming a lot that is incorrect.

You said the find might be of a "dwarf." I stated that it was impossible for it to have been a dwarf, because it would have a normal-sized head. (A normal head is the opposite of "microcephaly," BTW.)

I neither endorsed, nor critizied, the article, merely noted your error, and owe you no explanation about anything.

So "LOL" all you want.

Or, be a real man and apologize for making an ass out of yourself.

[Dimensio]

An apology from a known liar like nmh? He's much more likely to deny having made the comment that you discredited in the first place.

[nmh]

"Wow, you are hateful and assuming a lot that is incorrect."

Maybe DU is the forum for you!
I only questioned what you stated and "Wow" did you get your undies in knots!

"You said the find might be of a "dwarf." I stated that it was impossible for it to have been a dwarf, because it would have a normal-sized head. (A normal head is the opposite of "microcephaly," BTW.) "

Or a midget?

"I neither endorsed, nor critizied, the article, merely noted your error, and owe you no explanation about anything."

So why did you give one? Next time, don't bother till you have your emotions under control.

"So "LOL" all you want."

I continue to find you "LOL"!

"Or, be a real man and apologize for making an ass out of yourself."

Perhaps you ought to be the first to do that since I have nothing to "apologize" for. You have plenty.
BTW, spell checker is a good tool to use.