Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E Rocc

I agree that Calvin and Hobbes was a delightful interlude, but I DON'T agree with the author's premise that "Prickly City" is merely a "right wing" diatribe. Perhaps the author doesn't "get" political humor, of which "Day by Day" by Chris Muir is THE best and "Prickly City" is also wonderful (even "Get Fuzzy" has had some hilarious political overtones). Prickly City doesn't have the same style as C & H and doesn't pretend to do so. I understand the author's dilemma: the left takes awhile to get the joke unless President Bush is the punchline. In light of that, my new tag (below) really applies to the left.


13 posted on 10/09/2005 5:10:16 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (He who laughs last, thinks slowest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alwaysconservative

Prickly City is OK, but I think it belongs in the editorial section. Day by Day is OK too, but I'm a recent reader, so I think I'm missing some of the "in-jokes."


33 posted on 10/10/2005 3:39:26 PM PDT by MikeD (You can argue with your Maker, but you know that you just can't win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson