Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Im4LifeandLiberty

I don't recall saying that Roe Vs. Wade was unimportant to me. I do not consider it to be the end all be all that would be the only thing to prove the success of the conservative agenda. It is bad judicial finding to the extreme and never should have happened, but there are things of greater import I think that need to be dealt with. If Roe vs. Wade is overturned it will NOT markedly reduce the number of abortions. Should it be overturned? Yes. It shouldn't have existed in the first place. Will it be overturned? I don't know. I just have a feeling it won't be. I don't know that anyone in the court wants to bring up that ruling again. It was a mistake to have it in the court in the first place. Maybe after stevens and ginsburg are gone it will be. At that time, if they're not replace with other flaming liberals like they are, then Roe vs. Wade is toast.


377 posted on 10/17/2005 3:06:02 PM PDT by Allen H (An informed person, is a conservative person. Remember 9-11,God bless our military,Bush,& the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies ]


To: Allen H

I also do not think Roe will be overturned any time soon. I do think that a reversal would result in abortion bans in a number of states and a subsequent decrease in numbers of abortions. I base my conclusion on the impact of restrictions such as parental consent, waiting periods, and informed consent laws on abortion rates. Fewer abortions and more births took place after several abortion mills simply closed. Access *is* a factor here.


378 posted on 10/17/2005 4:59:18 PM PDT by Im4LifeandLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson