You know what's ironic about your statment? The same Senate that voted to take the interogation rights and limits away from the President and the military last week is the same group of weak senators that you want to decide if a well known polarizing conservative Judge gets confirmed to the Court. Don't you see a problem with that?
And I'm not going to argue Miers pro-life stance with you. It speaks for itself. There is NO rational argument that she's not strongly pro-life. Evidence, first hand accounts, and her personal and professional life the past 30 years prove that she is. I refuse to argue something that is well established and well confirmed by the passage of time.
This is what drives me nuts! I agree 110% with what you said! The rulings out of the Supreme Court are OUTRAGEOUS! The government allowing people homes to be taken for profit. The court sanctioned murder of Terri Schiavo and anyone else disabled that can't speak for themselves. Not allowing States the STATES RIGHT to execute a violent vicious murderer just because they're 17. On and on and on. But as of yet, there is no evidence that has come to light that would clearly indicate that Miers does not believe the same as you and I do. NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THAT IDEA. And until there is somcething concrete that can hold water, I REFUSE to speak against something on the basis of supposition and fortune telling, and add to the stupidly created rift in the conservative movement! That is all this has done. Conservatives with reasonable concernes have been unreasonable in their voicing of them and made a split in the conservative movement, giving the liberals just what they want. It has done nothing but hurt conservativism. And in a few months when Miers has proven to have become another strict constructionist conservative Christian Justice, all this hand wringing and accusing going on will be shown to be really foolish with no good having come from it.