Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MLB Playoff Preview Thread

Posted on 10/02/2005 2:56:49 PM PDT by mainepatsfan

2005 MLB POST SEASON MATCHUPS

ALDS

BOSTON RED SOX VS. CHICAGO WHITE SOX

NEW YORK YANKEES VS. LOS ANGELES ANGELS OF ANAHEIM

NLDS

SAN DIEGO PADRES VS. ST. LOUIS CARDINALS

HOUSTON ASTROS VS. ATLANTA BRAVES


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: mlb; sports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: mainepatsfan; Semper911; sheikdetailfeather; luv2ndamend; JohnnyZ; Chad Fairbanks; ...

2005 Season performances by BOS and CHA against Clement and Contreras (Game 1 preview)

7/21 @ CHA
Clement (6.0 IP, 4 ER, 6 H, 5 K, 2 BB, 109 pitches)

Everett, Konerko, and Rowand all homered off Clement.

Clement actually pitched well, but was unlucky with those homers.

In the game against Clement and our BP, only Rowand hit well (3/4) other than Perez's 1-3 with a BB. Everyone else had a poor batting average that game (only 1 of the 3 homers were not solo shots).

He just needs to keep his pitches down to make it tough to get those deep fly balls.
7/24 @ CHA
Contreras (5.2 IP, 3 ER, 8 H, 6 K, 2 BB, 116 pitches)

Ortiz and Tek both homered off Contreras.

Extremely high pitch count for Contreras in only 5.2 IP.

In the game against Contreras and the ChiSox BP, Millar went 2-3 with 1 BB; Tek went 2-4; and Cora went 2-3 (and the one missed hit was a deep ball that served as an RBI sac fly). Cora started the season with the Indians and was facing Contreras for the second time this year, FWIW.

Manny looked awful against Contreras, with 3 Ks. He needs to look at some video of him before Tuesday.

41 posted on 10/02/2005 7:07:40 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

Interestingly, Millar owns Contreras.


42 posted on 10/02/2005 7:09:48 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It's all about the pitching and Chicago has it. They shut down a Cleveland team desperate to win and who had been hot until running into a Tampa team that has given the Sox and Yankees problems all year. The Red Sox rely upon walks to make their offense work. Outside of Damon they have no real base stealing speed and they strike out a lot.


43 posted on 10/02/2005 7:51:18 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

0-3 and they go home in round 1


44 posted on 10/02/2005 7:52:48 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

They just ran out of gas at the end. Hot teams cool off at some point and these guys had a great run. The fans out there showed great class in supporting their team and thanking them for a great season.

Beware the Tribe next year.


45 posted on 10/02/2005 7:54:52 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Regarding the fans: Chief Wahoo is still smiling, why shouldn't we?


46 posted on 10/02/2005 7:58:09 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

You have to jump Contreras' fastball and smack it around to get him off his game. If you let him establish his fastball for strikes he will kill you with his splitter.

Clement needs to get his slider and 2 seamer over. If he can do that and keep the walks to a minimum he can do okay. Once guys get on base he tends to lose focus and panic.

The Black Sox don't get on base like the Red Sox do but they also steal a lot more and can create havoc on a team They play aggressive and force teams to make plays.

All comes down to whether or not we can light up their pitching early. Their bullpen is rather good....


47 posted on 10/02/2005 8:07:06 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

Agreed. I wanted the Red Sox and Tribe to get in, and the Yanks to miss out. Not only because it's be nice to have NYY sit one out for a change, but I do have friends in Cleveland/Akron, etc...and have been to several Tribe games when I visit them.

I believe the playoff teams are the same as last yr except
for AL Central and NL West, right?

IIRC:
2004--Yankees, Red Sox (WC), Twins, Angels, Braves,
Cardinals, Astros (WC), Giants

2005--Yankees, Red Sox (WC), White Sox, Angels,
Braves, Cardinals, Astros (WC), Padres

Too bad in a way that two teams that finished with identical w-l records couldn't get a one-game playoff to decide
who gets div. and who gets WC (they used head-to-head)

Boston Red Sox: 2005 AL East Division _CO-CHAMPIONS_ :)


48 posted on 10/02/2005 8:44:49 PM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Dodgers won the NL West in 2004.


49 posted on 10/02/2005 8:48:04 PM PDT by dfwgator (Flower Mound, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: raptor29

Wow, interesting background on the White Sox' owner and GM's family. I'm a Red Sox fan anyway... GO RED SOX! :o)


50 posted on 10/02/2005 9:38:13 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Chief Wahoo is still smiling, why shouldn't we?

Aww... sorry about your Tribe, Petronski, but as a Red Sox fan, I had to root against them. The Indians are a very good team and put up a good fight. I'm sure they will be back next year with a vengeance!

BTW, Is that Indian's name really "Chief Wahoo"?

51 posted on 10/02/2005 9:44:22 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

No sweat on the rooting against them, it doesn't have any effect. The Indians lost all on their own. ;O)

Yes. He's called Chief Wahoo, and is perhaps the coolest, funniest pro sports logo. So we got that going for us . . . which is nice.


52 posted on 10/02/2005 9:47:22 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: misterrob; dfwgator; mainepatsfan; GraniteStateConservative; TheRedSoxWinThePennant

I'm also worried that Boston may not have what it takes this year to beat a team like the Chicago White Sox...


53 posted on 10/02/2005 9:47:24 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I'm actually amazed they still get away with that (supposedly) politically incorrect 'grinning Indian' logo... ;-)


54 posted on 10/02/2005 9:49:07 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I'm a Red Sox fan out here in Chicago, and I couldn't believe that the White Sox would sweep Cleveland. I thought for sure the Indians would take Friday night easy. I thought for sure they'd win one. But we'll take it!


55 posted on 10/02/2005 9:51:37 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Thanks for pinging me to this thread and for the Game 1 preview. I'm assuming CHA = CWS?

This is going to be an interesting week...

56 posted on 10/02/2005 9:52:38 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

It's a point of contention, but changing it would be a disaster. It's actually a point of honor:


In its early years, the team now known as the Cleveland Indians had been known by several different names: the "Spiders", the "Naps", the "Blues", and the "Bronchos." The team received its final name in 1915 in a contest to determine its moniker. According to the Cleveland Indians' management, Chief Wahoo is meant to be a tribute to Louis Francis Sockalexis, a member of the Penobscot tribe who was the first Native American to play professional baseball. Team officials have insisted that Chief Wahoo is only a caricature not meant to demean Native Americans and that they have gone through great lengths not to associate the mascot with insensitive images such as tomahawks, teepees, and horsebacked warriors.


57 posted on 10/02/2005 9:57:37 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
I do not want to see Millar in any playoff game unless the score is 17-1.

Same here! He's doing just fine on the bench in his team mom/Manny translator/class clown role for the Sox. ;-)

58 posted on 10/02/2005 9:58:08 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Very interesting history of how Chief Wahoo came to be. Thanks for that info... I'm always interested to learn the history of the various baseball teams/organizations and their mascots. Americana and all that stuff.

We actually did cheer on the Tribe in person one day this summer. My husband and I attended a Cleveland Indians vs NY Yankees game on Saturday, July 9 at Yankee Stadium. (There was a Yankees "Old-Timers" game before the CLE game.) We were heading back from Sean Hannity's Freedom concert in NJ, so we figured it would be nice to stop at Yankee Stadium and see a game on the way home. The Tribe won that day 8-7!

You'll have to forgive us: We couldn't bring ourselves to cheer for Aaron Boone... ;-)

59 posted on 10/02/2005 10:17:01 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Re: Boone...



Heh heh heh. No prob. ;O)


60 posted on 10/02/2005 10:23:03 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson