There were wide open borders during WW I and WW II, pet. Well, there weren't platoons of troops stationed on them, nor what I suspect you think should be there today.
Your smarmy, unclever, illeducated, sniveling reposts, meant, I'm sure, to sound intelligent and oh so above all, are in fact, illogical, juvenile, snotty, and show that you have no understanding of this topic, whatsoever.
Hmmmmmmmmm...so you are so proud of yourself, thinking that any censorship of these pictures is akin to the rewriting of facts and/or the omission of facts, by the Chinese, or the Arabs, that you repeat it and agree that you still stand on your position, do you? Nothing like admitting that you're stupid and proud of it. LOL
Some of the pictures taken, are of Lyndie England performing sex acts with others and having them performed on her. You really want to see those, do you? You think that that's really helpful and that censorship of these pictures is dumb?
It's bad enough that the bad guys are mad at us for no reason at all, but you want to pour gasoline on the fire, just so that you can get your jollies, having them out there. That's deranged and quite frankly, your remarks are those of someone who is mentally ill!
The Brits had code breakers, during WW II, as we did. Following your abysmal lack of reasoning and logic, I guess that you think that that should have been published in American and English newspapers of the time, broadcast on the radio., and hey, why not have newsreel footage of our troops, with explicit directions to where they were, shown all over the world? Wouldn't that have been great?
During WW I, there was all kinds of propaganda against the Germans, published to make those fighting them want to hate them more. Most of the purported "facts" weren't true.
Al Jazeera does that today, using made up garbage and blood libel, to get the Islamonazisz even angrier at us. The lie about the Koran, that Newsweek dropped, inflamed some of the nutter terrorist and DID get people killed. During WW I and WW II and the Korean War, we did NOT post anything which wasn't okayed first by our government.
The Viet Nam War was the first time EVER, that war was brought into people's homes, to see...at dinner time, no less. Ninnies like you, didn't like it one bit and became anti-war. That's what you want now; I suspect. You want more and more deaths of our troops, innocents, and probably more attacks on America's soil. Elsewise, why would you post as you have done?
Give or take ...
There were wide open borders during WW I and WW II, pet. Well, there weren't platoons of troops stationed on them, nor what I suspect you think should be there today.
No, they were flying recon over the West Coast. I don't think we were letting a million or so people filter across the border unchecked. Heck, we even put the legal Japanese in camps. I shudder to think what happened to the illegal ones.
Your smarmy, unclever, illeducated, sniveling reposts, meant, I'm sure, to sound intelligent and oh so above all, are in fact, illogical, juvenile, snotty, and show that you have no understanding of this topic, whatsoever.
Flattery will get you nowhere.
Some of the pictures taken, are of Lyndie England performing sex acts with others and having them performed on her. You really want to see those, do you? You think that that's really helpful and that censorship of these pictures is dumb?
It's not my desire to see them or lack thereof that forms my opinion, it's my opposition to censorship. It reminds me of something Baghdad Bob would do. "Pictures? What Pictures? There are no pictures? Oh, THOSE pictures. They are merely family photos taken at Disneyland".
It's bad enough that the bad guys are mad at us for no reason at all
They might site the whole bombing the s**t out of Iraq and Afganastan and parading Saddam around in his underwear, and making a human pyramid out of unconvicted naked dudes as some kind of reason to be at least slightly annoyed.
but you want to pour gasoline on the fire, just so that you can get your jollies, having them out there. That's deranged and quite frankly, your remarks are those of someone who is mentally ill!
Hey, it's not nice to poke fun and yell at the mentall ill!
The Brits had code breakers, during WW II, .....
Sexually molesting prisoners of war is not a legitimate combat maneuver, and shouldn't need to be protected by anything. Come to think of it, I think we signed those silly "Geneva Convention" things were we took this exact position.
During WW I, there was all kinds of propaganda against the Germans, published to make those fighting them want to hate them more. Most of the purported "facts" weren't true.
If the pictures aren't true, then let it be known that they aren't true.
During WW I and WW II and the Korean War, we did NOT post anything which wasn't okayed first by our government.
Seems like that's the way you want it to stay. I don't. Peeople can have different opinions without being "mentall ill". Of course, you have to be mentally healthy to realize that. Therefore, I do not understand the second sentence of the paragraph I just typed.
Ninnies like you
I prefer "Ninny-American".
hat's what you want now; I suspect. You want more and more deaths of our troops, innocents, and probably more attacks on America's soil. Elsewise, why would you post as you have done?
No. Just like I don't think pictures of Police or Political misconduct shoudl be withheld from the public, nor do I believe military misconduct should be withheld.
I believe in reporting the facts, and letting the people decide.