Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Stu Cohen

Yes. What happened at Abu Grahib happened, and when (or if) these pictures are paraded forth, more will happen. The Islamo-fascist Jihadis will use them to fan hatred of America and more bombs will go off and more people will die if the pictures are released than if they are not released. Our difficult tasks in Iraq will be made more difficult.

The idiots who committed the Abu Grahib "atrocities" have already been punished. The half-wit looking Lyndie England just started serving her 3 year stretch.

As far as what happened to the Abu Grahib prisoners (many of whom were probably complicit in killing American soldiers) is no big deal as far as I'm concerned. In the Arab world, however, it is a real big deal. The only purposes motivating the ACLU and the Clinton-Judge are to (1) weaken America internationally, (2) aid the terrorists in Iraq, (2) give Splash-boy and Turbin more fodder for Senate speeches and (3) provide the NY Slimes with another 52 straight days of Front Page coverage of this "massive news event".

I say screw the ACLU, screw the judge, and for that matter, screw the jihadists who had to wear panties on their heads.


16 posted on 09/30/2005 9:03:19 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: San Jacinto
Yes. What happened at Abu Grahib happened, and when (or if) these pictures are paraded forth, more will happen.

Well, actions have consequences.

When we see pictures of their handiwork, it pisses us off. Should they censor those pictures?

If you don't want people to get angry about a misdeed, don't do it. The camera is simply the messenger of the action. The action is what people should/shouldn't be mad at.

The Islamo-fascist Jihadis will use them to fan hatred of America and more bombs will go off and more people will die if the pictures are released than if they are not released.

Well, we handed them the ammunition, didn't we? The camera is simply the messenger. Did we do the deeds, or did we not?

And when did every become so concerned with offending terrorists? I have never seen that as a top priority.

"Hey, don't invade Iraq, Islamofacists will use it as an excuse to fan the flames of hatred of America". I never heard that. I thought their opinion was irrelevant?

Our difficult tasks in Iraq will be made more difficult.

In that we have to make sure there aren't camera's around to document when we paint people's penises? Face it, if someone invaded your country, you would want to know what they were up to, and if they were as virtous as they held thmeslves up to be. They Iraqi's have a right to know what we did in the building every bit as much as they have a right to know what Saddam allegedly did. At least he wasn't stupid enough to take pictures.

The idiots who committed the Abu Grahib "atrocities" have already been punished. The half-wit looking Lyndie England just started serving her 3 year stretch.

Then let that be known when the pictures are released.

As far as what happened to the Abu Grahib prisoners (many of whom were probably complicit in killing American soldiers) is no big deal as far as I'm concerned.

If that is your position, then don't worry who it might "offend". Be proud of the pictures.

In the Arab world, however, it is a real big deal.

We do alot in the Arab world that is a bid deal.

The only purposes motivating the ACLU and the Clinton-Judge are to (1) weaken America internationally, (2) aid the terrorists in Iraq, (2) give Splash-boy and Turbin more fodder for Senate speeches and (3) provide the NY Slimes with another 52 straight days of Front Page coverage of this "massive news event".

Their motivations don't matter. Photos are photos. They are real or faked. If they are real, go ahead and report, then let the people decide. We don't need thought police.

I say screw the ACLU, screw the judge, and for that matter, screw the jihadists who had to wear panties on their heads.

For someone with such a "screw you" attitude toward jihadists, you seem to be overly concerned with offending them.

22 posted on 09/30/2005 9:24:17 AM PDT by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson