Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chena
EVEN THE JUDGE, in August, admitted that posting this pictures yet again could and probably would be BAD. So tell me, Stu, did you send in your $$$ to the ACLU, to help this judge buy his way to a decision?

The answer is no. I have never given money to the ACLU.

I have a question for you too. Is your son fighting for a corrupt goverment where judges can be "bought"?

Or do you firmly believe that this judge believes what you do....that the lives of our fellow Americans aren't as important as the posting of more pics on the internet and MSM. Good grief, man, are you insane?

He probably believes in Feedom of the Press, and all the warts that come with it. Every item on the Bill of Rights comes at a cost. Sometimes a great cost. Liberty isn't free. Sometimes it is downright expensive. And he probably realized that the military was fighting to preserve that very liberty.

Maybe that is why they ruled in that manner. Though I don't know the judge, and the above was simply a guess.

According to you, he could be bribed. So many somebody just bought him a Porche or something.

113 posted on 10/01/2005 7:55:35 AM PDT by Stu Cohen (I have an "ilk")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Stu Cohen
The judge wasn't going to rule this way, at first. He was either "bought" or gotten to, by someone/s. Is he "corrupt"? Well, he is a Clinton appointed judge.........you figure it out.
120 posted on 10/01/2005 2:27:27 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson