Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale; vannrox

Yeah, the amount of propellant can be smaller, provided the impulse is caused by the heat from the nuclear reaction. That could greatly cut the amount of propellant needed, which of course is reduces the overall weight, making the propellant used even more effective... Asimov's fictional rockets (the more or less conventional ones) used nuke-powered steam engines, and his explanation was that the mass*velocity of the propellant almost equals the mass*velocity of the craft (in any design using propellant), so less propellant going faster is the same as more propellant going slower. :')


97 posted on 09/27/2005 4:50:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

That's right. Less fuel is needed, and then less weight needs to be lifted because there is less fuel. The multiplier effect.


99 posted on 09/27/2005 7:30:40 PM PDT by RightWhale (We in heep dip trubble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson