Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwingcrazy
Nuclear powered booster: really, really expensive.

Chemical powered booster: really, really, expensive.

This is the reason why nuclear propulsion was discarded. There is unfortunately no compelling (economic) reason for manned space travel, and the specialized robotic missions that NASA and similar agencies mount each cost a lot more than the cost of the expendable boosters used launch them.

If we built such a thing, and sent humans to visit Mars and begin to colonize the Moon, I would be thrilled. But it isn't going to happen in our lifetime.

18 posted on 09/23/2005 3:33:55 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: megatherium
Nuclear powered booster: really, really expensive.

Yes, your right the initial development is really, really expensive, but unlike most SSTO's this is truly reusable and it can save money simply by being used for nuclear waste disposal.

After all, how much are they spending to create that National Nuclear Waste Disposal site?

29 posted on 09/23/2005 4:01:52 PM PDT by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson