Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnRoss
In the 1990s, Republicans such as myself condemned the Clinton administration for its nation-building activities in Bosnia and Kosovo. Yet, the president started an adventerous war in Iraq on the idealistic notion of recreating Iraq in our image: nation building,

Sorry guy but there is no comparison.
There were numerous reasons to go into Iraq,one of which was to light the fire of democracy and civilized existence in a region that has been a burning cauldron of barbarism for as long as recorded history.
It will take a long time to work if it is going to but with events of the last decade it is worth a try.
It is somewhat unfair to characterize it as "adventurous" or "idealistic".
There is a solid motive.

12 posted on 09/21/2005 6:25:37 PM PDT by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: carlr

Hardly, you don't understand Arab culture. I do, having lived among them. They don't take kindly to foreigners imposing governments upon them, whether they be Ottoman, British or American. Also, Iraq is an artificial country that only held together because of Saddam's tyranny.

The Brits couldn't control it in the 1920s.

Besides what strategic blow did the invasion of Iraq give to global terror. Having siezed Tehran with help from Iranian students who hate the mullahs would have done a far better job at that.

I think the war in Iraq has been nothing but naive stupidity.


29 posted on 09/21/2005 6:50:31 PM PDT by JohnRoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson