Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff
I am not for throwing money at a problem. The difference I heard from Bush the other night was that he wants to address the ownership issue regarding poverty.

Let's face it: the pathetic failure of 1960s housing and poverty "solutions" was, at least in part, due to the lack of INCENTIVE and OWNERSHIP. People were given a free ride with little or no responsibility.

Hopefully Bush's Katrina experiment will prove to be a good laboratory for turning this failure around. When people have a stake in their future, they take care of it...when they are on a never-ending supply of government services, they don't.

72 posted on 09/19/2005 8:11:33 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

that's all fine, the ownership theme and all. but you are assuming that its going to work, that we aren't going to see all these evacuees screaming on Nightline 6 months from now "Bush promised me a new free house and a car, where is it?". then what do we do?

I will answer that question - we give it to them as handouts. politically, there is no other way, we own this thing now. that is the problem.


94 posted on 09/19/2005 8:18:12 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson