Skip to comments.
David Gold is surprised that freepers are supporting FDR/LBJ-scale Katrina spending
David Gold Show ^
| Sep 18 05
| David Gold
Posted on 09/19/2005 7:50:12 AM PDT by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-247 next last
To: churchillbuff
It is a natural disaster of unprecedented proportions, I'd say a bit of TR (the other Roosevelt) is due here.
2
posted on
09/19/2005 7:51:37 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: churchillbuff
Am I supposed to have heard of David Gold?
3
posted on
09/19/2005 7:52:38 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: churchillbuff
Well clinton isn't proposing it, remember character counts.
4
posted on
09/19/2005 7:52:59 AM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: churchillbuff
I agree with Gold. My taxes are too high. Our federal deficit and federal debt are too big. Spending is out of control, and Clinton is using it all as an excuse to call for tax increases. the pressure for tax increases is going to build, unless spendig is cut. If I wanted huge federal spending, I'd support Hillary. I don't want huge federal spending - - so who should I support? The republican president isn't delivering on Republican small-government policies, so what do we do?
To: churchillbuff
Don't know who David Gold is, but he is correct. At $200 billion, we could just give every displaced family a check for $400,000. It's a monumental waste of money. The GOP are the worst spenders in history.
6
posted on
09/19/2005 7:53:59 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: churchillbuff
For sake of discussion, have we discussed WWRD? (What Would Reagan Do?)...
7
posted on
09/19/2005 7:54:12 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: churchillbuff
I haven't heard ANYBODY here supporting an FDR/LBJ style ANYTHING.
8
posted on
09/19/2005 7:54:23 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“I'm American, honey. Our names don't mean sh_t.”)
To: churchillbuff
Freepers are an argumentative lot.
The only reason this place works at all is that everyone does not go nuts on the same day.
9
posted on
09/19/2005 7:54:27 AM PDT
by
Glenn
(What I've dared, I've willed; and what I've willed, I'll do!)
To: Paradox
I'd say a bit of TR (the other Roosevelt) is due here.""
TR believed in self-reliance, and he didn't run budget deficits.
To: churchillbuff
If I wanted huge federal spending, I'd support Hillary. I don't want huge federal spending - - so who should I support? The republican president isn't delivering on Republican small-government policies, so what do we do? Drink. Heavily.
11
posted on
09/19/2005 7:54:41 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Rodney King
At $200 billion, we could just give every displaced family a check for $400,000. And rebuild the infrastruct, the ports, etc, that way? That analysis was pretty stupid.
12
posted on
09/19/2005 7:54:54 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: churchillbuff
To: Rodney King
The GOP are the worst spenders in history.
***
Nope. Dems have the Repubs beaten by quite a few miles in the spending department.
To: johnny7
I haven't heard ANYBODY here supporting an FDR/LBJ style ANYTHING. It's already happend in theis thread. FR has a large contingent of GOP cheerleaders who will support ANYTHING that W does.
15
posted on
09/19/2005 7:55:25 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Glenn
The only reason this place works at all is that everyone does not go nuts on the same day.You gave me a new sig line. Thanks!
16
posted on
09/19/2005 7:55:29 AM PDT
by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: churchillbuff
TR believed in self-reliance, and he didn't run budget deficits. But he did spend alot on conservatively questionable projects.
17
posted on
09/19/2005 7:55:49 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Just because we are not perfect, does not mean we are not good.)
To: churchillbuff
Who is is David Gold? Is he another Buchananite or a third party moron?
18
posted on
09/19/2005 7:56:10 AM PDT
by
jveritas
(The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
To: Paradox
And rebuild the infrastruct, the ports, etc, that way? That analysis was pretty stupid. Is the economics of the ports justify rebuilding them, there should be no problem floating bonds for them. The simple fact is that masssive federal bail-outs only encourage uneconomic behavior in the long run.
19
posted on
09/19/2005 7:56:50 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: churchillbuff
I agree with Gold. Lots of this is wasteful spending. Bush should not be pissing off his base (or cranking up govt spending like this), its not smart politics.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-247 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson