[Prime Choice]

Thinking that one must have unfettered access to mind-numbing drugs to be "free" is stupid. Drugs don't make you free. That's 1960s hippie bullcrap. 

[Know your rights]

By what principle does your so-called "conservative ideology" decide which non-rights-violating acts (which drug use is one of) should be punished by government and which should not?

Thinking that one must have unfettered access to mind-numbing drugs to be "free" is stupid. Drugs don't make you free.

Wearing a plaid shirt doesn't make you free, either ... so is it OK for government to ban that too?

[PaxMacian]

"Thinking that one must have unfettered access to mind-numbing drugs to be "free" is stupid. Drugs don't make you free."

Genesis 1:29
And God said, "See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food.

Should the federal government possess the power to ban a gift from God which within its flower mirrors the chemistry of our mind and in its seed mirrors the substance of our body? What other gifts may it seek to deny us in the future? Such hubris stems from the Manichean heresy and its error of seeing things as evil. No thing is evil, in and of itself, it possesses no such nature. Actions taken may be against the will of God and thereby be defined as evil. Individuals are always redeemable and therefore cannot be evil.

The greatest evil in this case is an unconstitutional war upon our own citizenry over a gift from God. It opposes the will of God, which made herb, saw that it was good, and gave it to man and beast alike. Though the heretics have been empowered by deceit for a time to portray evil as incarnate, truth and justice shall prevail in time.

Ephesians 6:12
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood,
but against principalities,
against powers, against the rulers
of the darkness of this world,
against spiritual wickedness in high places.