Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NicknamedBob
work on a carburetor designed to run on water. I told him it kept flooding out. Then we got into a serious discussion about it.

NO WAY!

38 posted on 09/11/2005 3:20:29 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Honor - Dignity - Courage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Lady Jag

Making a carburator that will disperse water into a manifold system is not too tough.

Making the water explode in the cylinder is a little tougher!


40 posted on 09/11/2005 3:32:29 PM PDT by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix off of my ping list as I have been asked to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Lady Jag; Dead Corpse; King Prout
"...work on a carburetor designed to run on water... -- NO WAY!"

I know it sounds Stupid!, but it is easy to explain.

Old style "steam engines" used an external combustion heat source to produce steam for engines which were not much different in function than locomotive engines.

Modern automobiles use internal combustion engines to capture the mechanical energy of expanding gases, while throwing away the heat energy, (think of all the heat that is discarded by the radiator!)

What I propose is a means of combining these techniques to gain the mechanical energy as well as the heat energy of the engine. If combined with other efficiencies, such as regenerative braking systems, one could envision a very efficient automobile indeed.

Sure, it sounds stupid, but why not?

41 posted on 09/11/2005 3:36:20 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (I am impervious to insult, being extraordinarily dense, rather like Superman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson