The author ignores the fact that some groups of stupid people are so dangerous that they must be damaged, even if the immediate [or long term] result is self damage at no gain.
the author doesn't ignore that, necessarily. long-term profit IS still profit.
IMHO, dying for the liberty of your 'tribe' isn't stupid, but it sure isn't very profitable either, in an individual sense. -- Which is the subject of this paper. True?
not sure it is all that simple.
individuals might consider they profit by dying for a cause or purpose they consider more important than their own lives - if they value their family or nation more than they value themselves, dying for the preservation of these higher-value entities constitutes profit.
Thanks, -- in essence, you've agreed with my original point. Looks like it was that simple.
that we agree on the point in question has been clear form the outset