To: ShadowAce; HAL9000; rdb3; Salo
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
4 posted on
09/09/2005 10:57:52 AM PDT by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Years ago Microsoft had a big minority position in SCO.
Do they still?
Are the SCO suits a Microsoft stalking horse against Open Source?
Or just desperate greed?
So9
5 posted on
09/09/2005 10:59:47 AM PDT by
Servant of the 9
(Those Poor Poor Rubber Cows)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
SCO chief executive Darl McBride tried to put a positive spin on the situation, claiming that the third quarter was "a productive quarter for SCO."
We will roast IBM's stomach in hell! All your Unix are belong to us!
6 posted on
09/09/2005 11:03:36 AM PDT by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So nobody's buying the BS. Not surprising.
BTW, have you seen, SCO yet again said it didn't get everything it asked for? They pissed off the judge a bit on their last request, prompting her "rote objections" comment, so I wonder if they'll prevail yet again. If so, forget the current schedule.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch. We dropped SCO as an offering to our customers in 2001, I can't believe we waited that long.
11 posted on
09/09/2005 11:28:41 PM PDT by
SoDak
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson