Replies

So dim...can you or anyone else tell us where that line is? The answer is no, and thus the left/liberals want to err on the side of death...right up to birth and beyond. But, if we err, we must err on the side of life, or we are wholly untrue to the foundational principles of this republic.

Hard to get around that right to life thing. All of the sophistry and fine words in the world will not negate it.

The prohibition that is really happening here is the prohibition on life itself. Whether we will choose life as opposed to convienence killing as a way of getting around the natural responsibility for unrestricted sex. When it is all boiled down, that is what is at issue here.

A society that chooses the former is true to its liberty roots...a liberty founded on moral responsibility. A society that chooses the latter is paving a road to hell and ruin with the death of its most innocent and defenseless.

See Firece Allegiance's post in 125.

Jeff Head wrote:

So dim...can you or anyone else tell us where that line is?

We all know where the SCOTUS put it, and 'viability' is being redefined downward every day. Soon it will be possible to have true 'test tube' babies raised in an artificial womb.

What then? Is every test tube mix a human from is sexless 'conception'?