Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Don't change the terms after the challenge has been taken. You didn't mention physical security in your challenge in the post I replied to, and I provided it for you. Challenge met. End of story.

Well the challenge was beat before it was ever offered. Any IT hack knows if you don't have physical security the box might as well be considered compromised.

Having said that, and I grant your loophole victory--if that makes you feel good. Let me restate a new challenge. Show me one buffer overrun that can be exploited where the physical security of the box isn't compromised.

409 posted on 08/30/2005 7:30:08 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]


To: for-q-clinton
Show me one buffer overrun that can be exploited where the physical security of the box isn't compromised.

For that we'll have to wait for the next remote buffer overflow exploit that Microsoft decides to sit on.

411 posted on 08/30/2005 7:45:02 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson