[flashbunny]

"But Internet explorer is just plain better and faster"

Srry, your'e living in the past there. It was better than netscape, especially when netscape was still lagging in it's rendering engine.

Now IE is in no way superior to firefox. As long as they continue to include the horrible ActiveX, it will continue to suck.

MS's usual policies of "innovate until you dominate" are at work with IE. Now the've stagnated an any 'innovation' they throw out is just a rehash or a copy of something firefox already does.

[Bush2000]

Now IE is in no way superior to firefox. As long as they continue to include the horrible ActiveX, it will continue to suck.

That's pretty hilarious coming from you, in light of the fact that FireFox has been slammed with a bumper crop of plug-in security vulnerabilities... I suppose if you think that the term "plug-in" is "superior" to "ActiveX", you're in for a world of hurt...

[Bush2000]

MS's usual policies of "innovate until you dominate" are at work with IE. Now the've stagnated an any 'innovation' they throw out is just a rehash or a copy of something firefox already does.

LOL! If, as you suggest, Firefox is superior to anything that MS does ... you have nothing to worry about.