Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/24/2005 4:06:40 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Book Description

Raising thriving, emotionally healthy sons does not require a man around the house! That's the conclusion of a groundbreaking research study that will open eyes, stir debate, and reassure nearly 10 million single mothers.

As the number of single-mom and two-mom households has grown, so have concerns about the possible damage to boys caused by the lack of a male role model in the house. Peggy F. Drexler, Ph.D., listened to all the dire warnings; but her training as a research psychologist told her she had to see the evidence. So she embarked on a long-term study comparing boys raised in female-headed families with those whose fathers were present throughout their childhood. What Dr. Drexler discovered is as heartening as it is startling:
o Female-headed households may be even better parents for boys than households with men
o Sons from these families are growing up emotionally stronger, more empathetic, and more well-rounded than boys from "traditional" mother-father families
o While more in touch with their feelings, these boys remain boyish and masculine in all the ways defined by our culture
Raising Boys Without Men offers an inclusive vision of what family can mean and a blueprint for raising happier, healthier sons.


2 posted on 08/24/2005 4:08:15 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Suggestion: If you have an Amazon account, review the reviewers. Currently the pro-Father reviews of this book have only one star and the reviews favorable to the book's premise have multiple stars.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1579548814/qid=1124924455/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-2224440-5105643?v=glance&s=books&n=507846


3 posted on 08/24/2005 4:12:40 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Ugh. Have mercy, kill me now.

How does trash like this get published? I can't imagine that such an egregiously flawed study would get by peer review except by inertia of shared ideological bias.

4 posted on 08/24/2005 4:13:17 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

The main argument of this liberal boys-don't-need-fathers book seems to be "It's true because I say so."

It should also be important to remember that girls in fatherless households, and boys and girls in motherless households, face the same kinds of problems that boys in fatherless households do.


5 posted on 08/24/2005 4:17:45 PM PDT by JillValentine (To the Left, Cindy Sheehan is a sacred cow. To me, she's just a cow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
The problem with crap like this book is that to some people, because it's in a book, then it must be true.

I'm ok with stupid people who believe claptrap like this, though. It will be much easier for my son to maintain an intellectual and common-sense advantage over people who believe this BS.

6 posted on 08/24/2005 4:18:00 PM PDT by Alien Gunfighter (Socialist liberals never imagine themselves as peasants under their 'perfect' socialist regime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
IMHO - Little girls need daddies so they won't be so compelled to look for male affection in their teen years.

Little boys need daddies to learn (a)how to treat women and (b)so they don't go searching for male affection (I mean that in an innocent connotation) but get taken advantage of by gay men looking for young boys to manipulate.
7 posted on 08/24/2005 4:25:58 PM PDT by CO Gal (Liberals, like puppies, are cute to look at, but shouldn't vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Maverick moms are dangerous without Maverick dads around.


8 posted on 08/24/2005 4:28:50 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Modern liberalism continues its war against human nature, insisting that somehow, despite all experience and evidence to the contrary, fatherless boys readily make good men. Odd, is it not, that the same people who profess such a belief in natural products and protection of the natural environment should so fiercely reject the idea that there is such a thing as human nature?


12 posted on 08/24/2005 7:37:06 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson