Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Huntress

At first I felt sorry for her and thought Prince Charles was a cad. I still think he is a cad but she was just as bad if not worse.


2 posted on 08/24/2005 2:56:27 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog
I still think he is a cad but she was just as bad if not worse.

Yeah, what you said.

30 posted on 08/24/2005 3:49:04 PM PDT by SmithL (There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog
I have mixed emotions about her. On one hand, I think she is a tragic figure. She did not know what she was getting into when she married Prince Charles, and couldn't handle her loveless marriage being in the spotlight. On the other hand, much of her behavior subsequent to her marriage was totally asinine. Diana and the British monarchy would have been much better off if she had married some obscure aristocrat, and Charles had married Camilla in the 1970s. The royal offspring would not have been as photogenic, but that's the only downside I see in this scenario.
31 posted on 08/24/2005 3:50:37 PM PDT by Huntress (Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog
......I still think he is a cad but she was just as bad if not worse......

I agree with attributing blame to the both of them: They were BOTH very immature people due their respective pampered upbringings.

53 posted on 08/25/2005 6:40:54 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson