Skip to comments.
Experimental HondaJet Makes Public World Debut at EAA AirVenture 2005 (PR from Honda)
PR Newswire ^
| July 28, 2005
Posted on 08/21/2005 7:21:25 AM PDT by snowsislander
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
I had no idea that Honda was involved in aviation until I happened over this story from back at the end of July.
To: snowsislander
I went to the EAA fly-in sometime around 65/66 (?) with my grandfather. I think it was the year that it was in Rockford, Ill. He had a Benson Gyro-copter and loved to fly that thing.
For anybody who likes airplanes that is one trip you have to make.
2
posted on
08/21/2005 7:34:17 AM PDT
by
PeteB570
To: snowsislander
I have owned nothing but Honda cars for the last 15 years because they were so well made. And I have done plenty of shopping around too.
My first Honda went 250,000 miles and still ran like new. And I never did anything to it but change the oil regularly.
My latest is a 4 door Civic that gets about 40 miles to the gallon- I fill it up once a month for less than $30
3
posted on
08/21/2005 7:36:44 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: snowsislander; Paleo Conservative; Clemenza
You guys want to round up the usual suspects? It would be fun to hear the comments on this baby.
4
posted on
08/21/2005 7:41:37 AM PDT
by
investigateworld
( God bless Poland for giving the world JP II & a Protestant bump for his Sainthood!)
To: snowsislander
Hope some of the hon-duh faithful are in the US aircraft industry.
To: Mr. K
We recently traded in a Ford Winstar for a Honda SRV, and love it!
This flying version is a pretty slick looking rig; there might be an increasing market for fast, smaller "general aviation" planes like this for people of means who might not be able to afford a Lear Jet but don't care for the anal exam every time they want to board a commercial flight.
Didn't Mitsubishi make the infamous "Zero" in WW-II?
I'd like to see someone come up with a moderized version of the German jet "Sparrow" (?) that they came up with late in the war; it was a sleek, hot little number that I bet a lot of civilian pilots / former Military JetJocks would have a ball with.
IIRC, it was about the same size as this Honda.
6
posted on
08/21/2005 7:50:34 AM PDT
by
Uncle Jaque
(Vigilance!)
To: investigateworld; snowsislander; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; ...


If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail not by posting to this thread.
7
posted on
08/21/2005 7:54:06 AM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: snowsislander
8
posted on
08/21/2005 7:55:47 AM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(War is Mankind's way of ridding the world of the tyranny caused by liberalism)
To: snowsislander
---HondaJet's patented over-the-wing engine-mount configuration helps eliminate the need for a structure to mount the engines to the rear fuselage and, thus, maximizes the space in the fuselage. Further, by determining the optimal position for the engines, the over-the-wing mount actually reduces drag at high speed to improve fuel efficiency. ---
The engine mounts caught my eye. No doubt it makes the craft quieter, too.
9
posted on
08/21/2005 8:00:00 AM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(War is Mankind's way of ridding the world of the tyranny caused by liberalism)
To: Loud Mime
The Germans tried that engine configuration back in the 60s.
To: snowsislander
I hope they bring it to the National Championship Air Races in Reno next month.
I don't see how the overwing mount of the engines is paptented...wasn't there was a bizjet/small airliner back in the 60's or 70's that had the same thing?
11
posted on
08/21/2005 8:19:28 AM PDT
by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
To: A.A. Cunningham
I knew I should have scrolled down further.
12
posted on
08/21/2005 8:20:33 AM PDT
by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
To: hattend
I don't see how the overwing mount of the engines is paptented...
I think the related patents might be these, which are more about how to design the mounting with respect to inviscid flow:
6,308,913
6,102,328
To: Paleo Conservative
The fuselage is a compact and lightweight unified carbon composite structure, and has the largest cabin in its class. The main wing, which features aluminum skin panels cut from single sheets of aluminium that provide a smoother surface than conventional wing configurations, along with Honda's proprietary turbulence-reducing laminar airfoil, work together to significantly improve aerodynamic performance. Additional drag-reducing technologies include the fuselage nose, which is designed to generate laminar flow. These features, in combination with Honda's fuel-efficient HF118 Turbofan Engine, provide fuel efficiency more than 40% better than conventional aircraft.
To: A.A. Cunningham
Good catch. Here's another photo of the VFW-Fokker 614
To: Mr. K
I have owned nothing but Honda cars for the last 15 years because they were so well made. And I have done plenty of shopping around too. My first Honda went 250,000 miles and still ran like new. And I never did anything to it but change the oil regularly. My latest is a 4 door Civic that gets about 40 miles to the gallon- I fill it up once a month for less than $30 Ditto on my experience with Toyota. My 4Runner is still running like new the same as when I purchased it back in 2000, and now with 160,000+ miles. That vs. a previous 'Ford' where the transmission broke at 60,000 miles and that was without and hard driving at all.
To: snowsislander
Anybody have a cost comparison to the Eclipse jet?
17
posted on
08/21/2005 11:05:15 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: snowsislander
I was commenting as to how Honda got a patent since it had been done before...I guess Fokker never applied for one.
I wasn't commenting about not understanding how it could be patented.
18
posted on
08/21/2005 11:29:19 AM PDT
by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
To: Paleo Conservative
I'm sure it's fast and quiet, but you just can't beat the distinctive sound of a plane with a Harley engine from
HogAir.
To: USNBandit
Anybody have a cost comparison to the Eclipse jet? I found this Bloomberg article which quotes an Asahi article giving a price range for the HondaJet of 100 million yen to 300 million yen, or roughly $1 million to $3 million.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson