Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway; Berosus; blam; dervish; Do not dub me shapka broham; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Flying_20wind_20generators

"According to [bing]'s link, thousands of the devices would fly 4.5km in the air. That means that to eliminate the chances of air collision, aircraft (including other flying generators) must stay further than 4.5km away. Assuming each full-sized unit would have a peak capacity of half a kW and operated at 85% load factor (Prof Mills: "flies six days out of seven") and occupied a hexagonal exclusion zone of 4.5km side-side, then the energy density of the power station = 500W / 4.5km 3¥sqrt(3)/2 = only 42 Watts per square km!!" -- FloridaManatee, May 27 2004


4 posted on 08/17/2005 9:43:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
...to eliminate the chances of air collision, aircraft... must stay further than 4.5km away."

Ya think??? Aircraft have enough problems currently with power lines and radio towers, even when they are well charted.

I think good solid nuclear reactors, on the ground, would solve a LOT of our energy problems.

23 posted on 08/17/2005 10:39:07 AM PDT by GoldCountryRedneck ("A Liberal with a cause is far more dangerous than a Hell's Angel with an attitude." - - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson