Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
And here we have:

***********************************************************

Here is why
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 31 2005 @ 04:39 AM EDT

This fits in nicely with M$ game plan. M$ wanted to use the well-written and secure GPL'ed code which is of course, available free of costs from web. Only way you could get around the obligaitons imposed by GPL was to claim Linux=Unix.

Include Linux in one of your products, and when copyright holder of the GPL'ed material accosts you, claim all linux is Unix and is licensed from SCO, therefore M$ is not obliged to conform with the GPL.


10 posted on 08/01/2005 12:12:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This fits in nicely with M$ game plan. M$ wanted to use the well-written and secure GPL'ed code which is of course, available free of costs from web. Only way you could get around the obligaitons imposed by GPL was to claim Linux=Unix.

And we know this because .... uhhhhhh ..... wellll .... uhhhhhh .... some random guy on the Web thinks so. Wow, I'm convinced! Sign me up for mind-reading classes today!
11 posted on 08/01/2005 12:17:20 PM PDT by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Semi related item here:

Fearing Microsoft Doesn't Pay
By James J. Cramer

14 posted on 08/01/2005 1:24:50 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson