Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: siunevada
Considering the talents of those involved in the movie I won't be seeing it--not that there was a chance of that to begin with.

People who like bestseller thriller type stuff seem to love it, as do people who claim to have more high-minded tastes who enjoy the Catholic bashing. Crap is crap, and crap wrapped up as some "expose of FACTS about the church" makes for a bestseller for all the Christian-bashers out there. They can read and enjoy their little fantasy and claim they are reading it because it has a lot of factual info, almost all of which has been completely disproven by the New York Times, even. Brown not only gets his theology wrong, but the head of some art institute wrote a piece for the NYT that showed Brown to not have a clue about what he was writing about in terms of the artworks he discussed.

My favorite error: Brown claims one of the figures in the painting is a woman, when someone who's taken the most basic art class knows that DaVinci and other artists commonly painted men with long hair. I mean, come on!

8 posted on 07/18/2005 4:54:54 PM PDT by Dr.Hilarious ("My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity."-Joe W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Dr.Hilarious

Good point about the painting.


11 posted on 07/18/2005 5:59:58 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson