To: grellis
I'm not saying I agreed with her, I just said I found her theory to be fascinating. I happen to agree that Dumbledore would not do anything that could be construed as "Dark."
And, speaking of Voldemort's Horcruxes, some seem to believe that Harry's scar may be one.
372 posted on
07/19/2005 1:06:47 PM PDT by
kellynch
(Whining about income inequality is a cop-out. -- Walter E. Williams)
To: kellynch
And, speaking of Voldemort's Horcruxes, some seem to believe that Harry's scar may be one. I don't think so. I think the creation of a Horcrux has to be intentional, and Voldemort's intention that night was for Harry to die, not to live with a scar.
373 posted on
07/19/2005 1:18:17 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: kellynch
I don't think Harry's scar could be a horcrux. First, he did not actually murder HP, and that seems to be required in "horcruxery", ha ha. I'm giddy. Should have shut the coffee off. I also don't think that VM had a chance to make a horcrux, but that brings up an interesting question: What exactly happened to VM in the immediate moments after he tried and failed to kill HP? We know it was his downfall; what else
do we know? Anyone?
Bueller?
374 posted on
07/19/2005 1:52:32 PM PDT by
grellis
(Ravenclaw, class of '87)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson