What "agenda"? If you're so in tune with my "agenda," tell us all what it is, and be ready to back up your claim with evidence. Your only alternative is to accept the fact that my agenda is simply to engage in a debate with any of these "rational people" you claim to know.
Speaking of "rational people," there you go again. As if only those who agree with you qualify as "rational people," right? On the contrary, I have yet to find anyone on your side who is willing to debate even the simplest points of this issue. In my and others' experiences, your side isn't the least bit interested in a debate. You just want a flamefest or an emote-a-thon. You just want to demonize anyone who dares to question your opinion, as if it is so perfectly high and self-evident and righteous that it transcends any possibility or need of being defended.
Instead of "rational people," I find emotional people like you, hurling invectives and accusations instead of debating the points. That's okay. This isn't to complain; it's just stating a fact. Say whatever you want. Just be ready to defend it with more than a lot of the same. Don't sit there and claim to be "rational" when all the evidence is to the contrary. Prove it. Or, if you can't, don't.
Now, you can prove me wrong by providing something of substance. Or, you can do yourself and your side a favor and simply be quiet. Otherwise, go ahead and post more of your baseless drivel, adding further proof that I've been right about you and yours all along.
You prove me right with your every post. Please, keep talking.