was commissioned by the father of the boy. When Gainsborough painted a dog if the right, lower corner, the father complained that he paid for a picture of his son...not a picture of a dog. With that, Gainsborough "edited" the picture.
I guess that this makes this commissioned work "NOT art"?
There is an art to avoiding vecksome individuals who seek to categorize the world of creative expression in terms of whether it is art or not. However, describing it violates a longstanding practise of avoiding things that are always better left unsaid.