If you want this vanity to address liberals, you've come to the wrong place.
Some people will never get it no matter how large of a club or how many time you hit them. They just seem to get dumber by the minute.
See, how wondrous is the spell-checker!
Much better.
Didn't you just post this a little while ago?
Great post! Semper Fi! Ooorahhhh...get some!
"...We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them."
I wonder if Musharraf knows this.
As nonsensical as blaming Roosevelt if he were to mention US soldiers fighting Germans in North Africa when we were attacked by Japan in Hawaii. D'UH....
A) I see that someone took exception to your use of the term "retard."
B) You're preaching to the choir-- and pretty ineffectively. [Calling names-- fie!]
Golly, once you acknowledge that Iraq and terrorism ARE connected, you then immediately have to ask, "What did Willie know and when did he know it?"
Libs ''choose'' not to get it. I think the other alternative ''to attack your attacker before he has a chance to kill you'' is something they cannot tolerate. They don't have the stomach for it. And as for their stupidity, it's scary how they think. One lib told me...''We should only attack the people that attacked us on 911 and they all committed suicide in those planes. So we should have done nothing after that.!'' Thats how they think folks!
Everyone thought Saddam was a threat, and Congress passed a resolution in 2002 advocating the use of force - voted for by some of the Democratic whiners of today. Democratic politicians have since discovered that their Democratic constituents think Bush is Hitler and ought to be impeached, and that they can score political points over people getting blown up in Iraq.