Replies

If you're wondering what the article's impact on the ASS will be, probably not a lot. It's pretty much just a left-leaning synopsis of what has happened so far; nothing new, just a recycled mixture of information and misinformation. Someone called it a "fluff piece", and I think that sums it up pretty well.

The Three Questions (TM) are still yet to be answered by any of the Andyites, and it's looking more like a scam by the hour.

160 posted on 06/30/2005 11:41:58 PM PDT by Chappaquiddick Crawdad ("E unum pluribus"? Perhaps you meant "ex uno plures", or is that "stultus sum"? hmmm...)

The DUmmies seem to think this "article" has answered all the questions about Andy Stephenson's unethical and possibly illegal fund-raising campaign. They seem to think this love note to Andy in a Seattle-based, "alternative", weekly "newspaper" (which is absolutely FREE, because no one would pay for it and that's the only way it can be distributed) vindicates him (and them).

But nothing could be further from the truth. I know DUmmies don't like the truth but the truth doesn't care how they feel about it.

The only thing this "article" does is raise another question: What is George Howland Jr.'s DU user name?

161 posted on 07/01/2005 7:05:11 AM PDT by MisterRepublican ("I am not at all comfortable going to Andy for confirmation of anything."- William Rivers Pitt)