bettyellen (1000+ posts) Thu Jun-30-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #93
102. He was not ready for immediate surgery at all, stop making inncorrect
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 11:03 PM by bettyellen
statements and spreading disinformation if you claim to care about the truth.
He had diabetes develop from the pancreaitis and could not get surgery until he was treated for that first. Somewhere in there he had a biopsy that didn't catch a good enough sample. His surgery date was iffy because of the diabetes.. A lot of things happened. Tests went on, exact diagnosis of the tumour itself was not 100% possible until cutting him open, it never is. Any of this was searchable info if people cared to clarify things, but many here sought to sow confusion and doubt instead.
All this timeline stuff is so oversimplistic-- the very assumption that if a prognosis doesn't bear out or circumstances or surgery dates change, there must be something nefarious going on, is deliberate and most willfull ignorance. The fact that the bile duct goes through the damned pancreas was deliberately ignored too. Anyone here could have googled it, but why didn't they??
Sorry to see you taken in by fallacy that he knew he had cancer and lollygagged on treatment soo much, or that any fundraising was done prior to April.
Wrong and wrong.
You think you were conned by your little and completely refundable donaton? Think again, the con lies elsewhere, and you are falling for it.