[SCALEMAN]

Notice, please, however, that this story STILL does not answer a single one of those three questions

It wasn't meant to. It is at best a 'puff piece' from the left assigning a political agenda to all those who question the red round one's integrity, although I did note the cast away remark about some (not conservatives though) have concerns about how the fund raiser was accomplished.

I am going to assume that you put the '3 questions' out there, and he just ignored them as irrelevant to his 'slant' on this.

[MisterRepublican]

Strange this reporter didn't bother to mention WillPitt and the many others at DU who have questioned the entire affair. One would get the impression that no one on the left has a problem with unethical fund-raising. The reporter didn't do too much work on this obvious puff piece. Wonder why the reporter didn't list Andy's PayPal info or PO Box so his readers could donate?

Ahh, but what to expect form amateur reporter for an alternative weekly?

[CaliGirl-R]

I wish a real journalist would write up this story. So many facts left out of this one. Sheesh. Then again, the story would take a lot of work to write out and would have to be published in more than one issue of the paper. Part One, Part Two etc.