I have no problem with them wanting the land only a problem with my government for forcing the owners off it to give it to them.
Welcome to FR.
What are you talking about? Your request has no context whatsoever.
Ok, I have missed something ... why?
Good luck with that... it's not pfizer's fault. It's the supreme court's.
Shouldn't be too hard since I'm a conservative in good health without need of drugs. You should take a look at some of the "What drugs do you take" threads at the democratic underground.
Boycott's are lame.
Should I go & pull the 4 crews I have working up there right now for a decision by someone else, namely the town of New London & SCOTUS?
I wanted the land too - (but didn't get it).
Will you boycott me too?
BTW... do you like cheese?
Contrary to some recent media reports, eminent domain has played no part in the development by Pfizer of its Global Research and Development Headquarters in New London CT. In fact, our offices, completed in 2001, were built on an industrial "brown field". Pfizer cleaned up pollution on the site from an abandoned mill and a scrap yard located there.
The recent Supreme Court ruling concerned an appeal by homeowners of property, located in a nearby neighborhood. They objected to the use of eminent domain by the City as part of its redevelopment plan.
Pfizer was not a party to that litigation, had no stake in the outcome of the case and has no requirements nor interest in the development of the land that is the subject of the case. Pfizer will not acquire any property in Ft. Trumbull.