Karla and Hillary: a tale of two women

Consider the contrast between Karla Homolka and Hillary Clinton: both were married to psychopathic rapists (Hillary still is); both played the part of enablers, Karla as a direct accomplice, Hillary as managress of the lid committee comprised of Terry Lentzner and two or three other PI groups which kept the lid down on Slick's sexual assault and rape cases via bribery and intimidation; and between the two of them, Karla has the halfway plausible excuse of being thrown into a meatgrinder at age 17 and effectively being brainwashed so that like Patty Hearst and Elizabeth Smart, she ignored opportunities to escape or break out of the situation.

Very nearly the same identical story in both cases, and the one woman is public enemy number one, while the other is a US senator from New York and a heroine to democrats and liberals. Pretty astonishing when you think about it.

Hillary Clinton is personally responsible for at least two or three dozen women being sexually assaulted and/or raped. She knew early on that in Slick she had a guy who was massively photogenic, a brilliant speaker with a photographic memory and clearly presidential material IF she could keep the lid down on the little problems, and there has been a lid committee in place from then to now comprised of Terry Lenzner and one or two other PI organizations whose task has been to bribe and/or intimidate all those women into silence.

It invariably worked, up to the Juanita Broaddrick accusation, because in every particular case it was just one woman with no real resources up against some sort of a thing with the full resources of one of the states or the United States behind it. Moreover, for something like that to have been in place all that time there is only one person on the planet who could have been in charge of it, i.e. Hillary Clinton.

I mean, You can watch the H. Clinton story occasionally on Friday and Saturday nights on the Grade B movie channel. The most common version shows some old crazy woman living in a cabin out in the swamp in the Louisiana bayous with two grown sons; the grown sons go out and rape and pillage at night and then the poor old crazy woman has to try to cover for them and keep the lid down. Substitute Slick for the two sons and that's basically the H. Clinton story.

The point at which I started taking these stories completely seriously was the interview with Elizabeth Ward Gracen in the Toronto Sun in which the reporter referred to Slick as "pig boy American president Bill Clinton"; the similarities between Gracen's story and that of Juanita Broaddrick were positively striking. Gracen was a former Miss Arkansas and Slick had said there would never be a Miss Arkansas that he didn't have; that doesn't leave a whole lot of room for taking no for an answer. Gracen claims the whole thing was a sort of a bad one-night stand, while friends claim she was in hysterics at the time and had obviously been raped. She started getting good acting parts at that time.

Paul Bernardo is clearly either a psychopath or whatever the next worse thing THAN a psychopath might be. I wouldn't want to have to bet on what the story with Karla Homolka is. She seems to have issues to work through one way or another. If I HAD to bet it I'd bet that she was mainly a victim of brainwashing techniques, particularly after reading the story of Bernardos last one or two prior girlfriends prior to Homolka.

But I could be wrong. Like I say, I'd not want to have to bet it. IF I'm wrong, and Homolka really is a total psychopath who was altogether as guilty of all of those rapes and murders as Bernardo was, then I could think of at least one useful occupation which she would be qualified for and to which she might be put which would be more productiive and humane than having the entire population of Canada out trying to be the first to bag her which is what the situation sounds like now:

I don't think that you are wrong! And don't you find it terribly troubling that neither of these two peices of human debris have ever personnaly addressed the rape accusation charge that Juanita made against Slick? How quickly people forget? A full 65% believed Juanita when she made her charge and about 0 to 1 % really care to put the Clintons where they belong!!!!!!

Ever wonder what would happen to you or me if either of us ever did a fraction of the **** which the KKKlintons have done? I suspect the story of Karla Homolka is your basic answer to that question. It reads as if the Canadian govt. has basically painted a target on the girl's back and is preparing to turn her loose for the whole country to use for target practice.

Overall, I'm pretty much with you but I've got a real problem with this statement:

"Karla has the halfway plausible excuse of being thrown into a meatgrinder at age 17 and effectively being brainwashed so that like Patty Hearst and Elizabeth Smart, she ignored opportunities to escape or break out of the situation."

In overreaching to make your otherwise very makable case, here you're courting moral relativism and straying into precisely the sort of gender-biased, mock victimhood which supposedly justified/rationalized Homolka's 'deal with the devil'.

Gender has nothing to do with the capacity for evil and mere age very little. Aside from the very real possibility that Karla has shown herself to be both more intelligent and manipulative than Bernardo, there's a considerable amount of evidence - apparently especially on the video tapes - indicating that, in the area of pure outright depravity, she's as bad or maybe even worse.

No offense intended but, if you seriously buy in this brainwashing nonsense, it's a pretty short and slippery slope to accepting her cock and bull amnesia story with regard to their assaults on 'Jane Doe'.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.