My bet is that most Judges probably believe that the testimony of two thirds of the witnesses in his/her Court are not telling the truth. It's the lawyers job to make the claim of Perjury and present the evidence of Perjury to the Judge. If the Judge feels the witness is not credible and Perjury charges are necessary. That will be decided in a separate case after the Perjured testimony is stricken from the record. and the Perjurer has his/her day in court.
Perjury is a hard to prove in most cases. In most cases the lawyer presents the facts of the case and the Judge or Jury decides who is more believable
MJY1288 WROTE: "My bet is that most Judges probably believe that the testimony of two thirds of the witnesses in his/her Court are not telling the truth. It's the lawyers job to make the claim of Perjury and present the evidence of Perjury to the Judge....Perjury is a hard to prove in most cases."
If you can't prove it with SWORN statments and/or SWORN filings about material issues, which TOTALLY contradict each other, what does it take???? It isn't my word against their word; it's THEIR word against their word!!! As the saying goes, "Were they lying then or are they lying now?"