Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hispanichoosier

If you read the books, you'll see Sam was not overplayed, and the books have ZERO - NADA - homosexual tones of any kind.

When I was a teenageer and young adult, I read and re-read LOTR numerous times. Drew maps. Learned runes. The whole thing, could recite parts of the books.

Have the extended versions of the movie.

IMO, Frodo was miscast. In the book, he was not a squeamish, delicate youth. He was a stolid man of 50.

Aragorn was also miserably miscast. Mr. "No Blood for Oil" was not kingly. Theoden was kingly. Mr. "No Blood"s eyes are too close together, his voice not commanding, his presence too self absorbed, and his persona more of a loser/loner than a descendent of the line of kings. Especially his voice was bad.

Just a couple of thoughts.


85 posted on 06/24/2005 8:32:03 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
eyes are too close together, his voice not commanding, his presence too self absorbed, and his persona more of a loser/loner than a descendent of the line of kings

But compared to Viggo "The Lights Are On But Nobody's Home" Mortenson, the Aragon character is the second coming of Robert E. Lee. I was just boggled by the interviews I saw; you could practically see in his eyes and out his ears.

(/trashy celeb bashing)

91 posted on 06/24/2005 8:46:01 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Working Class Zero with wall-to-wall carpeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson