Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Izzy Dunne
HELP IS ON THE WAY:


222 (two hundred [and] twenty-two) is the natural number following 221 and preceding 223. It is a repdigit composite number, and its factorization makes it a sphenic number. It is also a Harshad number.

There is no solution to the equation x - psi(x) = 222, making 222 a noncototient. Nor is there, in base 10, an integer that added to the sum of its own digits yields 222, making 222 a self number.

Radii at 0 degrees and approximately 222.49 degrees divide a circle in the golden ratio.



The ratio of the areas B / A equals the golden ratio.


The first triple repdigit in the square root of 222 is 222:

square root of 222 =
14.89966442575133971933181604612395114023452166218124
73380574030119289350747022456370098357196526519656
52139396484012226637696242316850851449289924...


A prime reciprocal magic square based on 223 in base three has a magic constant of 222.

Given 10 unlabelled nodes, 222 lattices can be created.

Two hundred and twenty-two is also:
Room 222 (TV show)
Bell 222 (helicopter)
278 posted on 06/24/2005 8:19:37 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: OESY

Thanks for the info on 222! Thats my second most favorite number, after 256.

I made a 222 (of 240) on my PSAT, and that damn score got me LOTS of scholarship money. You can see why I like it!

It's also in my phone number.


292 posted on 06/24/2005 8:24:06 AM PDT by Zeppelin (Keep on FReepin' on.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: OESY
I knew all that, of course - why do you think I wanted to be post 222?

;->

389 posted on 06/24/2005 8:59:27 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: OESY

Can you prove that there are no uninteresting numbers?


643 posted on 06/24/2005 11:05:29 AM PDT by bruin66 (Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: OESY
But did you consider the coefficient of gravity into your equation, it doesn't appear so.

...or the 13 dimensions of space and its effect.

722 posted on 06/24/2005 11:35:56 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson