To: Halfmanhalfamazing; zot; Interesting Times
While the court majority defenders will declare that the court sided with "Big Business" it has actaully sided with the goals of a communist state where there are no individual property rights.
Perhaps this will be the straw that will break the people's back in wanting to have liberals incharge of the supreme court.
6 posted on
06/23/2005 6:10:17 PM PDT by
GreyFriar
(3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
To: GreyFriar
Perhaps this will be the straw that will break the people's back in wanting to have liberals incharge of the supreme court.
I think/hope it will be, and I'm so so thankful that the liberal media isn't ignoring this.
But I'm still curious as to what a fix for this is. Would originalist judges be able to reverse this? How can we recover? Sorry for sounding like I'm scared/cornered, but that's how I feel.
To: GreyFriar
While the court majority defenders will declare that the court sided with "Big Business" it has actaully sided with the goals of a communist state where there are no individual property rights. Thanks for the ping. You got that right.
I hope this will awaken more people to the communist agenda disguised as liberalism, but I'm not sure it will.
28 posted on
06/23/2005 6:36:16 PM PDT by
zot
(GWB -- four more years!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson