Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Halfmanhalfamazing; zot; Interesting Times

While the court majority defenders will declare that the court sided with "Big Business" it has actaully sided with the goals of a communist state where there are no individual property rights.

Perhaps this will be the straw that will break the people's back in wanting to have liberals incharge of the supreme court.


6 posted on 06/23/2005 6:10:17 PM PDT by GreyFriar (3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GreyFriar


Perhaps this will be the straw that will break the people's back in wanting to have liberals incharge of the supreme court.


I think/hope it will be, and I'm so so thankful that the liberal media isn't ignoring this.

But I'm still curious as to what a fix for this is. Would originalist judges be able to reverse this? How can we recover? Sorry for sounding like I'm scared/cornered, but that's how I feel.


13 posted on 06/23/2005 6:13:58 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar
While the court majority defenders will declare that the court sided with "Big Business" it has actaully sided with the goals of a communist state where there are no individual property rights.

Thanks for the ping. You got that right.

I hope this will awaken more people to the communist agenda disguised as liberalism, but I'm not sure it will.

28 posted on 06/23/2005 6:36:16 PM PDT by zot (GWB -- four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson